From The Critic: “A Yellow Bore”
ONE IS BEGINNING to dread the coming around of the quarters
of the year. Not
because they mark the flight of time, but because
they announce the coming of The Yellow Book. To
know that every three months we are to
have our peace
of mind disturbed by the appearance of this strange
compound of
insolence and the commercial spirit has now,
with the third number, become little
less than a bore. At first we
were amused; then, with the second number, we felt a
mild curi-
osity to see if the editors could repeat their absurdities; they
did,
and so curiosity was satisfied. Now we have no other emotion save
that of
boredom in seeing Aubrey Beardsley‘s and Max
Beer-
bohm‘s agonized vulgarities. In their
efforts to attract attention
with the current issue of their Quarterly, the editors
have stepped
over the boundary line of decency. Where is Mrs. Ormiston Chant
that she does not have the work suppressed? Mr. Beardsley’s
“Wagnerites” and Mr.
Beerbohm’s “George IV.” are more in-
decent than any “living pictures” that were
ever exhibited in a
public hall. These young men are evidently determined to see if
they cannot be suppressed into notoriety, as were Oscar
Wilde and
George Moore, It is one thing to be indecent and another to
be
dull. This number of The Yellow Book is both, and we
confess
that we are very bored of Mr. Beardsley and Mr. Beerbohm. If
the
former looks like his portrait of himself, and if he sleeps in a
catafalque, as he
represents himself as doing, one is not surprised
that he dreams bad dreams—the
only surprise is that he should put
them on paper. Mr. Beardsley speaks by the card
when he says
that “tous les monsters ne sont pas en Afrique.”
MLA citation:
“A Yellow Bore.” Review of The Yellow Book, vol. 3, October 1894, The Critic 10 November 1894, p. 316. Yellow Nineties 2.0, Edited by Lorraine Janzen Kooistra, Ryerson University Centre for Digital Humanities, 2019. https://1890s.ca/yb3-review-critic-nov-1894/