Editorial prefaces to new magazines
generally lay
great stress on the effort of the directorate, and
all
concerned, to make the forthcoming periodical
popular.
We have no such expectation: not even, it may be
added, any such intention. We aim at thorough-going
unpopularity: and
ther is every reason to believe
that, with the blessed who expect
little, we shall not be
disappointed.
⁂
In the first place, THE PAGAN REVIEW is frankly
pagan: pagan in sentiment, pagan in
convictions,
pagan in outlook. This being so, it is a magazine
only for those who, with Mr. George Meredith, can ex-
claim in all
sincerity—
“O sir, the truth, the truth! is’t in the skies,
Or in the grass, or in this heart of ours?
But O, the truth, the truth! . . . . “—
and at the same time, and with the same author, are
not
unready to admit that truth to life, external and
internal, very
often
“. . . . . . is not meat
For little people or for fools.”
To quote from Mr. Meredith once more:
“. . . . . these things are life:
And life, they say, is worthy of the Muse.”
But we are well aware that this is just what “they”
don’t
say. “They”, “the general public”, care very
little about the “Muse” at
all; and the one thing they
never advocate of wish is that the “Muse”
should be so
indiscreet as to really withdraw from life the approved
veils of Convention.
Nevertheless, we believe that there is a by no means
numerically insignificant public to whom THE PAGAN
REVIEW may appeal; though our paramount difficulty
will be to
reach those who, owing to various circum-
2 THE PAGAN REVIEW
stances, are out of the way of hearing aught concerning
the most recent developments in the world of letters.
⁂
THE PAGAN REVIEW conveys, or is meant to convey,
a good deal by its
title. The new paganism is a potent
leaven in the yeast of the “younger
generation”, without
as yet having gained due recognition, or even any
suffi-
ciently apt and modern name, any scientific designation.
The
“new paganism,” the “modern epicureanism,” and
kindred appellations, are
more or less misleading. Yet,
with most of us, there is a fairly definite
idea of what
we signify thereby. The religion of our forefathers has
not only ceased for us personally, but is no longer in
any vital and
general sense a sovereign power in the
realm. It is still fruitful of vast
good, but it is none
the less a poer that was rather than a power that
is.
The ideals of our forefathers are not our ideals, except
where
the accidents of time and change can work no
havoc. A new epoch is about
to be inaugurated, is,
indeed, in many respects, already begun; a new
epoch
in civil law, in international comity, in what, vast
and
complete though the issues be, may be called
Human Economy. The long
half-acknowledged, half-
denied duel between Man and Woman is to
cease,
neither through the victory of hereditary overlordship
nor the
triumph of the far more deft and subtle if
less potent weapons of the
weaker, but through a frank
recognition of copartnery. This new
comradeship will
be not less romantic, less inspiring, less worthy of
the
chivalrous extremes of life and death, than the old
system of
overlord and bondager, while it will open
perspectives of a new-rejoicing
humanity, the most
fleeting glimpses of which now make the hearts of
true men and women beat with gladness. Far from
wishing to disintegrate,
degrade, abolish marriage, the
“new paganism” with fain see that sexual
union
become the flower of human life But, first, the rubbish
must be
cleared away; the anomalies must be replaced
by just inter-relations; the
sacredness of the individual
must be recognized; and women no longer have
to look
upon men as usurpers, men lo longer to regard
women as
spiritual foreigners.
FOREWORD 3
⁂
These remarks, however, must not be taken too liter-
ally as indicative of the literary aspects of THE PAGAN
REVIEW.
Opinions are one thing, the expression of
them
another, and the transformation or reincarna-
tion of them through
indirect presentment another still.
This magazine is to be a purely literary, not a
philosophical, partisan, or propagandist periodical.
We are concerned
here with the new presentment of
things rather than with the phenomena
of change and
growth themselves. Our vocation, in a word, is to
give artistic expression to the artistic “inwardness”
of the new
paganism; and we voluntarily turn aside
here from such avocations as
chronicling every ebb
and flow of thought, speculating upon every fresh
sur-
prising derelict upon the ocean of man’s mind, or
expounding
well or ill on the new ethic. If those who
sneer at the rallying cry,
“Art for Art’s sake,” laugh
at our efforts, we are well content; for
even the lungs
of donkeys are strengthened by much braying. If, on
the other hand, those who, by vain pretensions and
paradoxical clamour,
degrade Art by making her
merely the more or less seductive panoply of
mental
poverty and spiritual barrenness, care to do a grievous
wrong by openly and blatantly siding with us, we are
still content; for
we recognise that spiritual byways
and mental sewers relieve the
Commonwealth of much
that is unseemly and might breed contagion.
THE
PAGAN REVIEW, in a word, is to be a
mouthpiece—we
are genuinely modest enough to disavow the definite
article–of the younger generation. In its
pages there will be found a
free exposition of the myriad
aspects of life, in each instance as
adequately as possible
reflective of the mind and literary temperament
of the
writer. The pass-phrase of the new paganism is ours:
Sic
transit gloria Grundi. The supreme interest of Man
is—Woman: and the
most profound and fascinating
problem to Woman is Man. This being so,
and quite
unquestionably so with all the male and female pagans
of
our acquaintance, it is natural that literature domi-
nated by the
various forces of the sexual emotion should
prevail. Yet, though
paramount in attraction, it is,
4 THE PAGAN REVIEW
after all, but one among the many motive forces of
life;
so we will hope not to fall into the error of some
of our French confreres
and be persistently and even
supernaturally awake to the functional
activity and
blind to the general life and interest of the common-
wealth of sould and body. It is LIFE that we preach,
if
perforce we must be taken as preachers at all; Life to
the full,
in all its manifestations, in its heights and
depths, precious to the
uttermost moment, not to be bar-
tered even when maimed and weary. For
here, at any
rate we are alive; and then, alas, after all—
“how few Junes
Will heat our pulses quicker. . . “
⁂
“Much cry for little wool”, some will exclaim. It
may
be so. Whenever did a first number of a new
magazine fulfil all its
editor’s dreams or even inten-
tions? “Well, we must make the best of
it, I suppose.
‘Tis nater after all, and what pleases God”, as
Mrs.
Durbeyfield says in “Tess of the Durbervilles.”
⁂
Have you read that charming roman à quatre, the
“Croix de Berny?” If so, you will recollect the
fol-
lowing words of Edgar de Meilhan (alias Théophile
Gautier), which I (“I” standing for editor, and asso-
ciates, and pagans in general) now quote for the delec-
tation of all
readers adversely minded or generously
inclined, or dubious as to our
real intent—with blithe
hopes that they may be the happier therefor:
“Frankly,
I am in earnest this time. Order me a dove-coloured
vest, apple-green trousers, a pouch, a crook; in short
the entire
outfit of a Lignon Shepherd. I shall have a
lamb washed to complete the
pastoral.”
⁂
This is “the lamb.”
⁂ Readers are requested to note the administra-
tional remarks on
the inside of the cover (p. ii.), and the
Forecast and Editorial intimations
printed at the end
of the text.
MLA citation:
Brooks, W.H. [William Sharp]. “Foreword.” The Pagan Review, vol. 1, August 1892, pp. 1-4. The Pagan Review Digital Edition, edited by Dennis Denisoff and Lorraine Janzen Kooistra, 2010. Yellow Nineties 2.0, Ryerson University Centre for Digital Humanities, 2021. https://1890s.ca/tpr-brooks-foreword/