Usable according to the Creative Commons License Attribution Non-commercial Share-alike.
Our editorial method is informed by social-text editing principles. By “text” we mean verbal and visual printed material, including non-referential physical elements such as bindings, page layouts, and ornaments. We view any text as the outcome of collaborative processes that have specific manifestations at precise historical moments. The Yellow Nineties Online publishes facsimile editions of a select collection of fin-de- siècle aesthetic periodicals, together with paratexts of production and reception such as cover designs, advertising materials, and reviews. This historical material is enhanced by two kinds of peer-reviewed scholarly commentary: biographies of the periodicals’ contributors and associates; and critical introductions to each title and volume by experts in the field. All scholarly material on the site is vetted by the editor(s) and peer- reviewed by them and/or an international board of advisors. The site as a whole is peer- reviewed by NINES (Networked Infrastructure for Nineteenth-Century Electronic Scholarship). Contributors to the site retain personal copyright in their material. The site is licensed with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 license. Both primary and secondary materials, including all visual images, are marked up in TEI- (Textual-Encoding Initiative) compliant XML (Extensible Markup Language). To ensure maximum flexibility for users, magazines are available on the site as virtual objects (facsimiles) in FlipBook form; in HTML for online reading; in PDF for downloading and collecting; and in XML for those who wish to review and/or adapt our tag sets. In order to make ornamental devices, such as initial letters, head- and tail- pieces, searchable, we have developed a Database of Ornament in OMEKA, and linked it to the relevant pages of each magazine edition. As a dynamic structure, a scholarly website is always in process; Phase One of The Yellow Nineties Online (2010-2015) is completed and Phase Two (2016-2021) is underway.
Painter, printmaker, draughtsman, gallery founder, multiple society-member, art critic, lecturer, social net-worker par excellence, and prolific memoirist: William Rothenstein’s energies were, as Wyndham Lewis once remarked, “parcelled out over a wide field” (Lewis 218). Beyond this, aspects of his identity have always been hard to pin down. Rothenstein was a northerner who lived largely in the south; a cosmopolitan with a firm faith in the English tradition; a purveyor of small pencil portraits who espoused covering large walls with paint; and a seemingly conservative artist who nevertheless encouraged many of the big names in modern British art, Lewis included.
Throughout his life, Rothenstein mingled on mutual terms with a multitude of names that seem likely to last longer than his own. These included artists such as Henri Toulouse-Lautrec (1864-1901), Edgar Degas (1834-1917), Auguste Rodin (1840-1917) and Augustus John (1878-1961); and writers such as Max Beerbohm (1872-1956), Joseph Conrad (1857-1924), and Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941). As a portraitist he commanded sittings from leading politicians, scientists, and social reformers. In the somewhat sceptical words of his close friend Charles Conder (1868-1909), Rothenstein was clearly an “important personage” (Galbally 235), and yet he was an anxious leader also, just as likely to withdraw from centre stage as to take it.
Rothenstein was born in 1872 in Bradford, West Yorkshire, the fourth child of Bertha and Moritz Rothenstein, a successful textile merchant who had emigrated from Germany in the 1860s. His parents were Jewish, but worshipped infrequently; in unpublished notes for his memoirs, Rothenstein wrote of his father: “he was not much in sympathy with Jewish tradition. He was more attracted by Unitaranianism” (Houghton Library, Harvard). Rothenstein was educated at Bradford Grammar School, but his talent for the fine arts persuaded his family to send him to London to study at the Slade School of Art in 1888. After a year working under Alphonse Legros (1837-1911), he followed his fellow student Arthur Studd (1866-1919) to Paris, where he enrolled in the Academié Julian.
Rothenstein remained in Paris from 1889-92, making important contacts within the European and Anglo-American artist communities based there. Though he would later destroy much of the work produced in this period, some key paintings have survived, not least the Tate-owned Parting at Morning (1891), which takes inspiration from Puvis de Chavannes (1824-1898), Degas, and Robert Browning (1812-1889). Several sketchbooks also exist, which reveal a loose, Impressionistic drawing technique, which Rothenstein would later abandon in favour of heavier, unbroken lines and a firm sense of design.
In 1892 Rothenstein, encouraged by Toulouse-Lautrec, shared an exhibition with the
Anglo-Australian artist Charles Conder at Père Thomas’s in the Boulevard Malesherbes.
Attended by Camille Pissarro (1830-1903) and Edgar Degas, and well-reviewed in the
French press, the exhibition suggested a bright future for Rothenstein in the French
capital. Nevertheless, the following year he chose to return to England to work on a
series of portraits (published by Grant Richards as Oxford Characters in 1896). This
was the first of several collections of delicate lithographic, pencil or chalk
portraits depicting men and women of distinction, examples of which would also appear
in
At the same time he began exhibiting larger works at the New English Art Club,
including paintings such as
From 1894 to 1899 Rothenstein was based in Chelsea, where he mixed with a wide circle
of artists and writers including Max Beerbohm (1872-1956),
Laurence Binyon (1869-1943), Charles Ricketts (1866-1931),
Walter Sickert (1860-1942), and—before his arrest in
April 1895—Oscar Wilde (1854-1900). Though Wilde would tease
the young artist for his seriousness and sobriety, others (including Beerbohm, who
created a memorable written portrait of Rothenstein in his short story “Enoch
Soames”) noted his wit, energy, and high-spiritedness. These qualities are clearly
present in his writing from this period, which included art criticism for
Rothenstein’s Parisian connections were especially valuable at this time. In 1895 he was instrumental in organising a visit from Paul Verlaine (1844-1896) to London; in the next few years he was responsible for furthering the reputation of Rodin in England. The Carfax Gallery, which Rothenstein co-founded in 1898 with the archaeologist John Fothergill (1876-1957), was the site of Rodin’s first solo-show in England. The Carfax also showed the work of Beerbohm, Conder, Ricketts, Augustus John, and, posthumously, Aubrey Beardsley (1872-1898). Rothenstein resigned from his official role at the gallery in 1901, whereupon it fell under the management of Robert Ross, More Adey, and Arthur Clifton.
It could be argued that Rothenstein fulfilled the role of sensible older brother to many 1890s characters. At various points, he shared studios with both Conder and Beardsley, on whom he acted as a steadying influence. Despite the company he kept, Rothenstein’s decadence only went so far, and the behaviour of his fellow artists often bemused him. Acquiring a collection of Kitagawa Utamaro’s prints in Paris, Rothenstein was embarrassed by their eroticism and duly passed them onto Beardsley, who was not only un-embarrassed, but pasted them up on the walls of his bedroom.
Such stories indicate why Rothenstein’s first son, the art historian John Rothenstein, would later claim that the spirit of the 1890s was not one with which his father felt comfortable. After his marriage to the actress Alice Knewstub in 1899, Rothenstein’s art took a turn towards more austere, serious subjects. Gone were the illustrations to Balzac, Voltaire, and Villon; in came studies of his wife and children, and a series of paintings depicting Jewish life in the East End of London. The 1900s also saw Rothenstein step up his activities as a lecturer, establishing himself as a leading figure in the public mural movement. This led, eventually, to his appointment as Chair of Civic Art at the University of Sheffield in 1917 and, after the war, to the directorship of the Royal College of Arts, which he held from 1920 to 1935. Although Rothenstein’s work gained great critical success in the 1900s, receiving praise from critics such as Roger Fry, Laurence Binyon, and D. S. MacColl, sales remained poor and he relied on family money to keep his career going.
Ironically, considering his interest in French art, a trip to India in late 1910
ensured that Rothenstein missed the controversy surrounding Fry’s 1910 exhibition,
Rothenstein’s reputation received a boost in the early 1930s, upon the publication of
the first of three volumes of his memoirs,
Knighted in 1931, Rothenstein was by now considered an establishment figure, though
he would describe his 1938 exhibition,
Despite Robert Speaight’s 1962 biography and subsequent publications by Mary Lago, Rothenstein’s life and work were relatively neglected in the second half of the twentieth century. More recently, however, scholars have begun to re-evaluate the contribution he made to the British art scene, particularly in the period 1890-1920. Special focus has been given to his 1910 visit to India (and related role within the India Society), his Anglo-German connections, his Anglo-Jewish identity, and his campaign for public patronage. Good examples of his work, including over a hundred major paintings, can be found in public galleries across the United Kingdom. His archives are held at Harvard’s Houghton Library.
© Copyright 2013
Samuel Shaw, University of York Samuel Shaw’s research focuses on the late nineteenth and early-twentieth century British art world, with a particular interest in the relationship between artists, critics and the art market. He is currently writing a study of William Rothenstein. In Autumn 2013 he will join the Yale Center for British Art as Post-Doctoral Associate in Prints and Drawings.