<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="../../../Schema,%20CSS%20and%20Template%20Files/YB_schema2.rnc" type="application/relax-ng-compact-syntax"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
    <teiHeader>
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title>Yellow Nineties 2.0</title>
                <title>The Yellow Book: An Illustrated Quarterly, Volume 6 July 1895</title>
                <title type="YBV6_waugh_auction"/>
                <editor>Lorraine Janzen Kooistra</editor>
            </titleStmt>
            <editionStmt>
                <p>
                    <date>2020</date>
                </p>
            </editionStmt>
            <publicationStmt>
                <idno>YBV6_28pr</idno>
                <publisher>Yellow Nineties 2.0</publisher>
                <pubPlace>Ryerson University Centre for Digital Humanities</pubPlace>
                <address>
               <addrLine>English Department</addrLine>
               <addrLine>350 Victoria Street,</addrLine>
               <addrLine>Toronto ON,</addrLine>
               <addrLine>M5B 2K3</addrLine>
               <addrLine>Canada</addrLine>
            </address>
                <availability>
                    <p>Usable according to the Creative Commons License <ref
                            target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/">Attribution
                            Non-commercial Share-alike</ref>.</p>
                </availability>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <biblStruct>
                    <monogr>
                        <editor>
                            <persName>Henry Harland</persName>
                        </editor>
                        <author>Arthur Waugh</author>
                        <title>The Auction Room of Letters</title>
                        <imprint>
                            <publisher>John Lane</publisher>
                            <pubPlace>London</pubPlace>
                            <publisher>Copeland &amp; Day</publisher>
                            <pubPlace>Boston</pubPlace>
                            <date>July 1895</date>
                            <biblScope>Waugh, Arthur. "The Auction Room of Letters." <emph
                                    rend="italic">The Yellow Book</emph>, vol. 6, July 1895, pp. 257-265.
                                    <emph rend="italic">Yellow Book Digital Edition</emph>, edited by
                                Dennis Denisoff and Lorraine Janzen Kooistra, 2010-2014. 
                                <emph rend="italic">Yellow Nineties 2.0</emph>, 
                                Ryerson University Centre for Digital Humanities,
                                2020. https://1890s.ca/YBV6_waugh_auction/ </biblScope>
                        </imprint>
                    </monogr>
                </biblStruct>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
        <encodingDesc>
            <editorialDecl>
                <p>Our editorial method is informed by social-text editing principles. By “text” we mean
                    verbal and visual printed material, including non-referential physical elements such as
                    bindings, page layouts, and ornaments. We view any text as the outcome of collaborative
                    processes that have specific manifestations at precise historical moments.
                    The Yellow Nineties Online publishes facsimile editions of a select collection of fin-de-
                    siècle aesthetic periodicals, together with paratexts of production and reception such as
                    cover designs, advertising materials, and reviews. This historical material is enhanced
                    by two kinds of peer-reviewed scholarly commentary: biographies of the periodicals’
                    contributors and associates; and critical introductions to each title and volume by
                    experts in the field. All scholarly material on the site is vetted by the editor(s) and peer-
                    reviewed by them and/or an international board of advisors. The site as a whole is peer-
                    reviewed by NINES (Networked Infrastructure for Nineteenth-Century Electronic
                    Scholarship). Contributors to the site retain personal copyright in their material. The
                    site is licensed with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0
                    license. Both primary and secondary materials, including all visual images, are marked
                    up in TEI- (Textual-Encoding Initiative) compliant XML (Extensible Markup
                    Language). To ensure maximum flexibility for users, magazines are available on the site
                    as virtual objects (facsimiles) in FlipBook form; in HTML for online reading; in PDF for
                    downloading and collecting; and in XML for those who wish to review and/or adapt our
                    tag sets. In order to make ornamental devices, such as initial letters, head- and tail-
                    pieces, searchable, we have developed a Database of Ornament in OMEKA, and linked it
                    to the relevant pages of each magazine edition. As a dynamic structure, a scholarly
                    website is always in process; Phase One of The Yellow Nineties Online (2010-2015) is
                    completed and Phase Two (2016-2021) is underway.</p>
            </editorialDecl>
        </encodingDesc>
        <profileDesc>
            <creation>
                <date>1895</date>
            </creation>
            <langUsage>
                <language ident="en">English</language>
                <language ident="la">Latin</language>
            </langUsage>
            <textClass>
                <keywords scheme="#lcsh">
                    <list>
                        <item>English literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals</item>
                        <item>Great Britain -- Periodicals</item>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
                <keywords scheme="ninesGenre">
                    <list>
                        <item>Nonfiction</item>
                        <item>Book History</item>
                        <item>Periodical</item>
                        <item>Essay</item>
                        <note>Possible genres: Architecture, Ephemera, Music, Poetry, Artifacts,
                            Fiction, Nonfiction, Religion, Bibliography, History, Paratext, Review,
                            Collection, Leisure, Periodical, Visual Art, Criticism, Letters,
                            Philosophy, Translation, Drama, Life Writing, Photograph, Travel,
                            Education, Manuscript, Citation, Book History, Politics, Reference
                            Works, Family Life, Law, Folklore, Humor. Please include as many as
                            apply. Place each in its own item tag </note>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
                
                <keywords scheme="ninesType">
                    <list>
                        <item>Periodical</item>
                        <note>Possible Types (singular): "Periodical" (texts/most stuff), "Interactive Resource" (current writing, 
                            biographies, not old reviews), "Still Image" (images, visual art), "Physical Object" (posters,
                            prospecti)</note>
                        <!-- only choose one item-->
                    </list>
                </keywords>
                
                <keywords scheme="ninesDiscipline">
                    <list>
                        <item>Book History</item>
                        <item>Literature</item>
                        <note>Possible Disciplines (multiple): "Book History (include for all periodical items)," "Literature," "Art History (use for art, also use for reviews)," "History (don't use in a general sense)," "Theatre Studies,"
                            "Musicology," "Philosophy," "Anthropology," "Science"</note>
                        <!--Add items as necessary. Remove items not used.-->
                    </list>
                </keywords>
                
            </textClass>
        </profileDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text>
        <body>
            <div n="YBV6_28pr" type="prose">
                <pb n="281"/>
                <head><title level="a">The Auction Room of Letters</title></head>

                <byline>By <docAuthor><ref target="#AWA">Arthur Waugh</ref></docAuthor></byline>

                <p>" THE present position of the literary man in England is very<lb/> much that of
                    an auctioneer. He offers his goods for<lb/> sale ; other people, middlemen, come
                    and bid for them, and the<lb/> prize goes to the highest bidder." I have not the
                    exact words by<lb/> me as I write ; nor, in a case of this sort, do exact words
                    matter<lb/> very greatly. It is at least true that to this effect, and
                    essentially<lb/> with this intention, a leading man of letters has within the
                    last<lb/> month delivered himself upon the art which he espouses, that he<lb/>
                    asks us to accept, as an illustration or parallelism, this comparison<lb/> of
                    his calling with the huckstering of the auctioneer, and that such<lb/> a
                    pronouncement appears, if one may conjecture assent from a har-<lb/> monious
                    silence, to be received without disapproval by a large<lb/> number of his
                    fellow-artists.<lb/></p>

                <p>Now in the <emph rend="italic">obiter dicta</emph> of distinguished men there is
                    often more<lb/> food for reflection than is evident at first sight, and this
                    playful&#x2014;<lb/> or was it perhaps a reproachful ?&#x2014;metaphor of
                    auctioneer and<lb/> public, carries a good deal more of import on its back
                    than<lb/> " many such like as'es of great charge," which are bruited abroad<lb/>
                    into fame from day to day. It contains in little the whole story<lb/> of the
                    present position of authorship ; it reflects the past, it fore-<lb/> bodes the
                    future, and it adorns its tale by pointing a strenuous<lb/></p>

                <fw type="catchword">moral</fw>
                <pb n="282"/>


                <fw type="runningHead"><fw type="pageNum">258</fw> The Auction Room of Letters</fw>

                <p>moral which these few pages will do their best to indicate. For<lb/> the
                    situation, which one is first inclined to laugh away as ridicu-<lb/> lous, has
                    its serious side as well, and it is a question whether the<lb/> time has not
                    arrived when we should take the literary auctioneer at<lb/> his own valuation,
                    and write him off the books.<lb/></p>

                <p>The first thing that strikes one, I suppose, is the consideration<lb/> of how
                    immensely things have changed in the last few years to<lb/> make such utterance
                    as that which opens this paper possible.<lb/> Except for a few dingy and
                    detached houses here and there, houses<lb/> which seem to break out in the
                    centre of our trim red-brick lines<lb/> of villadom&#x2014;like ghosts to
                    trouble joy&#x2014;except for these (and they<lb/> are few), Grub Street is no
                    more. We all remember, or our<lb/> fathers at least have declared unto us, the
                    old-world vision of the<lb/> publisher. He was a Colossus, set up at the receipt
                    of custom,<lb/> under whose huge legs the wretched authors, petty men,
                    peeped<lb/> about, striving to rivet his attention with humble tributes of
                    care-<lb/> fully copied manuscript. For such as he regarded there remained<lb/>
                    hard terms and an invidious reputation. To-day all this is changed.<lb/> It is
                    now the author (have we not received it on his own authority ?)<lb/> who mounts
                    into the rostrum, hammer in hand, and having at his<lb/> side a bundle of
                    type-writing, distributes to the struggling middle-<lb/> men a printed synopsis
                    of the material on offer, and proceeds to<lb/> start the bidding with a
                    wholesome reserve price. Then the<lb/> publishers continue one against the
                    other, pitting royalty against<lb/> royalty, advance against advance, till down
                    comes the hammer and<lb/> off go the copy and the profits. Nor, mark you, is the
                    auctioneer<lb/> contented yet ; the open market, he says, is still not open
                    enough<lb/> for his desires. It seems that these men of business do not know
                    <lb/> the secrets of their own beggarly trade (have we not this, too, on<lb/>
                    the authority of the author ?). They are the victims of a miser-<lb/> able
                    niggardliness which forbids them to bid to the value of the<lb/></p>

                <fw type="catchword">material</fw>
                <pb n="283"/>


                <fw type="runningHead">By Arthur Waugh <fw type="pageNum">259</fw></fw>

                <p>material. Soon the auctioneer will do without them. He will out<lb/> into the
                    square, with twenty thousand copies of his novel in bales<lb/> behind him, and
                    will sell them to the surging public himself, like a<lb/> cheap-jack on bank
                    holiday. Then, even if he tires in the mid-<lb/> summer heat, and is so sadly
                    overwrought at night that his hand<lb/> declines the pen, he will still have had
                    his reward, he will have sold<lb/> himself without favour, and the family
                    stocking will gape with<lb/> shekels. Faugh ! " an ounce of civet, good
                    apothecary !" The air<lb/> grows heavy.<lb/></p>

                <p>We have had enough, I fancy, of this picture. In drawing it,<lb/> I doubt not,
                    the author who is responsible for my elaboration did<lb/> so with more sincere
                    regret for current circumstances than could<lb/> ever be felt by an alien to his
                    art ; he merely stated a fact,<lb/> and that indisputable. There is, moreover,
                    no possible profit in<lb/> lingering over trivial bickerings which the
                    complacency of one<lb/> party and the self-advertisement of another have dragged
                    into<lb/> the full view of the public press. Here, at least, the future<lb/> may
                    be trusted to take care of its own ; there can be but one<lb/> end. The purpose
                    of this paper is otherwise. It may be well,<lb/> perhaps, to consider by what
                    steps the author reached the<lb/> rostrum, what he is doing there for art, and
                    where he will<lb/> find himself when in the whirligig of time he is forced
                    to<lb/> descend. Finally, it may be asked how all this is likely to serve<lb/>
                    letters in the future, and what sort of literature is likely to<lb/> be produced
                    under such conditions. For every man who sets<lb/> pen to paper, be he Laureate
                    or the humblest journalist, <emph rend="italic">must</emph>, so<lb/> far as he
                    is worthy of his calling, prefer the welfare of literature to<lb/> the gains of
                    his own exchequer, and much of the lamentable policy<lb/> which has ushered in
                    this new era of letters has been due, it is but<lb/> fair to suppose, to an
                    honest but misdirected desire to further her<lb/> claims to recognition. Is she,
                    then, we may ask, likely to benefit<lb/></p>
                <fw type="catchword">by</fw>
                <fw type="footer">The Yellow Book&#x2014;Vol. VI. <emph>Q</emph></fw>
                <pb n="284"/>


                <fw type="runningHead"><fw type="pageNum">260</fw> The Auction Room of Letters</fw>

                <p>by this perpetual insistence upon pecuniary reward ? And if not,<lb/> where will
                    she suffer ?<lb/></p>

                <p>The increase in the author's emolument has been traced to<lb/> many sources ; yet
                    the most likely origin has been strangely over-<lb/> looked. A little
                    reflection, however, will show that the growth in<lb/> prices has advanced <emph
                        rend="italic">pari passu</emph> with the multiplication of periodical<lb/>
                    literature. Forty or fifty years ago there were comparatively few<lb/>
                    magazines, and the novelist was obliged to work in the large.<lb/> His every
                    output was a full-length novel : the making of this took<lb/> time, and the rate
                    of production was slow. By sure degrees, how-<lb/> ever, the taste for snippet
                    literature has grown and grown ; one<lb/> magazine after another has leapt into
                    success, and the demand for<lb/> the short story has become paramount. At the
                    same time com-<lb/> petition has arisen. Each new magazine desires to open with
                    the<lb/> best names : no author, however prolific, could keep pace with<lb/> the
                    whole field : it becomes necessary, therefore, for editor to bid<lb/> against
                    editor. The booths are set up, and business is astir.<lb/> Meanwhile, more and
                    more material is forthcoming : the short<lb/> stories are collected into books :
                    the many serials seek their<lb/> publishers. Obviously, therefore, the number of
                    these industrious<lb/> middlemen must increase ; the same interests come to the
                    surface,<lb/> and there follows a further competition to secure
                    book-rights.<lb/> Then follows the question of time. Editors begin to look
                    ahead.<lb/> If they cannot have Mr. X.'s next story, they invite a <emph
                        rend="italic">lien</emph> upon<lb/> the next but one, and in a very short
                    time the author finds himself<lb/> bound far into the future. Here, then, by the
                    simplest method of<lb/> evolution, we have the prevalent problems of competition
                    and<lb/> literary mortgage. And very far afield have these things led us of<lb/>
                    late.<lb/></p>

                <p>The air is full of rumours, the papers of paragraphs, which bear<lb/> evidence to
                    the strain of rivalry between men of business reacting<lb/></p>

                <fw type="catchword">upon</fw>
                <pb n="285"/>


                <fw type="runningHead">By Arthur Waugh <fw type="pageNum">261</fw></fw>

                <p>upon authorship. We are told of one author who has bound<lb/> himself to the end
                    of the century to produce stories of one<lb/> kind and another to fit the dates
                    of his editors. Year<lb/> in, year out, in sickness or in health, in the heat of
                    summer<lb/> and the bite of winter, is that author fixed to his desk, pen<lb/>
                    in hand, covering reams of foolscap, for the satisfaction of<lb/> contracts
                    entertained without the prejudice of circumstance.<lb/> We know of another
                    author, exploited by a far-seeing editor,<lb/> whose work was so universally
                    advertised by paragraph and table-<lb/> talk, that actually before his first
                    book was in proof at the printers<lb/> it had been lauded by half the papers in
                    London as a coming<lb/> wonder. Nor do exceptional examples of this kind stand
                    unsup-<lb/> ported by a common environment. The very conversation of<lb/>
                    literature is changed : its view of its own privileges is translated.<lb/> When
                    two men of letters are discussing a third, do they set them-<lb/> selves to
                    speak of the literary quality of his last volume, of its<lb/> sincerity, its
                    distinction, its place in the progress of thought ?<lb/> Nine times out of ten
                    the subject that chiefly interests them is<lb/> the rate of pay which he
                    receives per thousand words. Indeed,<lb/> that same phrase, " per thousand words
                    " has slain ten thousand<lb/> reputations. You might range the living novelists
                    now, in a list<lb/> of their own recital, apportioning their fame by that " rate
                    per<lb/> thousand words." Indeed, to hear and to read of some of them,<lb/> one
                    verily believes that there are authors who think, feed, and<lb/> dream upon this
                    rate of theirs, until they are half sick with green<lb/> jealousy when they hear
                    that A. and B. have " gone up " by a<lb/> guinea this month, while they
                    themselves have declined by a<lb/> shilling. And this, too, is called literary
                    ambition.<lb/></p>

                <p>Indeed, the reader of these random observations will by this<lb/> time have
                    noticed, it may be with amusement, that they tend to<lb/> treat literature as
                    though it were solely confined to the modern<lb/></p>

                <fw type="catchword">novel.</fw>
                <pb n="286"/>


                <fw type="runningHead"><fw type="pageNum">262</fw> The Auction Room of Letters</fw>

                <p>novel. For the present context this must be the case. The con-<lb/> cerns of the
                    auction-room are so far centred upon fiction alone.<lb/> For, as we have already
                    noticed, this activity of the middleman is<lb/> necessarily dependent on the
                    demand of the mob, and while it is<lb/> probable that more books are being read
                    in this year of grace than<lb/> in any of its predecessors, it is also certain
                    that at no time has the<lb/> general public been so blind to the claims of
                    literary merit. For<lb/> poetry it has no taste and absolutely no judgment. If
                    it is told<lb/> sufficiently often that a certain poem is fine literature, it
                    will in<lb/> time come to believe it, much as it takes its religious tenets
                    on<lb/> trust, because it has heard them so often promulgated. In neither<lb/>
                    case can it appreciate for itself. For criticism, sociology, philo-<lb/> sophy
                    it has no ear; it seeks amusement, and it buys the latest<lb/> story. Hence it
                    comes that it is the field of fiction alone that is<lb/> given over to
                    profitable money-making ; hence, too, it follows<lb/> that the successful
                    novelist has come to regard the six-shilling<lb/> novel as the only vehicle of
                    literary expression, and has taken<lb/> himself rather more seriously than
                    circumstances have demanded.<lb/> Nevertheless, from a purely insular point of
                    view he is, beyond<lb/> doubt, a very important person. It is ungracious in an
                    English<lb/> man to reflect, even in passing, upon his motherland, still it
                    is<lb/> difficult to avoid the confession that Napoleon's definition of<lb/> us
                    was regrettably true in its essentials. We are, by nature, a<lb/> nation of
                    shopkeepers, and the thing that sells best among us has<lb/> gained a spurious
                    but incalculable importance. The novelist,<lb/> therefore, has now his day, and
                    he is making the best of it. He<lb/> looms large in the public gaze : he fills
                    columns of the public<lb/> prints : the work he produces is, by virtue of its
                    popularity, <emph rend="italic">the</emph><lb/> literature of the hour. It only
                    remains to concede the situation,<lb/> and to consider whether, under the
                    progress of present circum-<lb/> stances, it is likely to be the literature of
                    the-future.<lb/></p>

                <fw type="catchword">A literary</fw>
                <pb n="287"/>


                <fw type="runningHead">By Arthur Waugh <fw type="pageNum">263</fw></fw>

                <p>A literary critic, himself no less distinguished than the novelist<lb/> whose
                    words are serving us for a text, has recently expressed his<lb/> view of the
                    probable complications in store for the novelist. He<lb/> said, if my memory
                    stands good, that the prevalence of the<lb/> pecuniary estimate was resulting in
                    a pressure all along the line,<lb/> that the author, in demanding high terms of
                    the publisher, was<lb/> pressing him to such a degree that he was, in turn,
                    forced to press<lb/> the bookseller, and that the final result would be that the
                    public<lb/> would refuse to respond, and that the old machinery would be<lb/>
                    thrown out of gear. Well, there may be truth in this, but there<lb/> is a good
                    deal to be said on the other side. The publisher, after<lb/> all, is no
                    sucking-dove, no shorn lamb which needs our poor<lb/> protection, if his grasp
                    of business principles is insufficient to<lb/> keep him out of unprofitable
                    bargains, he can only thank his own<lb/> indiscretion if he finds himself in
                    eventual liquidation. He starts<lb/> business as a business-man, and as a
                    business-man he must be<lb/> judged. He is fairly sure to take care of himself.
                    On the con-<lb/> trary, it is the novelist who must look to his own interests :
                    for it<lb/> is they and not the publishers that are in jeopardy. We have
                    seen<lb/> how this eternal care for pence results in injudicious contracts
                    ;<lb/> let us now see whether these contracts will not, in reaction, end<lb/> in
                    a lack even of those miserable pence for which they were<lb/> contrived. We are
                    all slow to learn by experience, but really the<lb/> tardiness of the novelist
                    is amazing. You would suppose that,<lb/> with the field of literature scattered,
                    as it is, with dead and dying<lb/> reputations, the author would begin to lose
                    some confidence in the<lb/> constancy of his public, but it is just this
                    fickleness that he is <lb/> slowest to comprehend. He makes one immense,
                    phenomenal<lb/> success, and in a flash the world is all before him. He will
                    plant<lb/> vineyards and oliveyards, he will store up his grain in goodly<lb/>
                    garners ; he will live happily for ever after. And all the while at<lb/></p>

                <fw type="catchword">his</fw>
                <pb n="288"/>


                <fw type="runningHead"><fw type="pageNum">264 The Auction Room of Letters</fw></fw>

                <p>his ear Experience is whispering unheard, " Thou fool ! this<lb/> night shall thy
                    fame be required of thee."<lb/></p>

                <p>The British public is the most fickle body that ever drew<lb/> together for
                    mutual protection, and in nothing is it more fickle<lb/> than in its literary
                    predilections. The idol of its afternoon is an<lb/> outcast by sunset, and the
                    only possibility of retaining its favour<lb/> lies in an assiduous and
                    heart-whole study of its inclination. The<lb/> novelist who is to continue
                    popular must work with every instinct<lb/> clear, every faculty alive ; he must
                    change his course and tack<lb/> with the popular breeze ; his eye must follow
                    every cloud, be<lb/> it no larger than a man's hand, for the least shadow on
                    the<lb/> horizon grows in an hour into a tempest. During the last few<lb/> years
                    there has been success upon success that promised stability :<lb/> one
                    reputation has trod upon another's heels, has passed, and<lb/> lost outline.
                    There is scarcely a prominent novelist of twelve<lb/> years ago who enjoys an
                    equal favour to-day. All this your<lb/> optimist adventurer forgets. He forgets,
                    too, that those grinding<lb/> contracts of his will press upon him at the very
                    hour when he is<lb/> least in trim for work, that in their obligation he is
                    bound, in<lb/> course of time, to turn out material unworthy of his best,
                    and<lb/> that the public, reminded of this by its critics&#x2014;reminded, too,
                    by<lb/> a certain sense of selection which, to do it justice, it has
                    acquired<lb/> in its study of fiction&#x2014;will have no compunction, in the
                    hour of<lb/> his distress, in bowing him to the door. Then the publisher,
                    too,<lb/> will desert his auction-room, and his occupation will be
                    gone.<lb/></p>

                <p>You cannot serve Art and Mammon ; indeed, it is hard enough<lb/> to serve Mammon
                    alone, for any length of time, with any con-<lb/> sistency of return. And if the
                    novelist is likely, by mixing himself<lb/> overmuch with business interests to
                    compass his own financial<lb/> ruin, is it probable that he will contrive, in
                    the stress of his daily<lb/> avocations of the rostrum, to leave behind him the
                    name of an<lb/></p>

                <fw type="catchword">artist,</fw>
                <pb n="289"/>


                <fw type="runningHead">By Arthur Waugh <fw type="pageNum">265</fw></fw>

                <p>artist, a reputation that can endure ? No man deserving the<lb/> name of author
                    ever yet wrote a book without some faint hope<lb/> that it might outlast
                    himself; that he might be raising, if not<lb/> the fabric, at least the pedestal
                    of a " monument more enduring<lb/> than brass. " Yet no book ever lived, it is
                    safe to say, that was<lb/> thrown off " in feverish haste to satisfy the demands
                    of an impor-<lb/> tunate publisher. Nowadays, the word ' Dignity ' is
                    supposed<lb/> to carry with it the trail of the prig : still, every
                    profession,<lb/> sincerely followed, is capable of dignified repute. Where,
                    then,<lb/> in all this turmoil of the market, is the boasted dignity of letters
                    ?<lb/></p>

                <p>If ever a calling existed in England whose record was studded<lb/> with things
                    noble and of good report, it is the calling that can<lb/> boast the service of
                    Shakspeare, of Milton, of Goldsmith, and of<lb/> Wordsworth. Surely the shadows
                    of the great must move rest-<lb/> lessly in shame by Stratford Church and
                    Chalfont stream when<lb/> they learn that the literary man is, upon his own
                    confession and<lb/> at his own desire, translated into an unctuous auctioneer.
                    But<lb/> shame should not be confined to the dead : it is high time that<lb/> it
                    infected the living. There are signs, fortunately, that it is even<lb/> now
                    doing so. It may be, indeed, that we ourselves are beginning<lb/> to appreciate
                    that the new era of letters is not so much decadent<lb/> as vulgar ; it may even
                    prove that the next development of the<lb/> problem will be a return to taste
                    and a recrudescence of dignity.<lb/> If so, the uses of perversity will have
                    gained another example,<lb/> and the cause of literature will have been served
                    by what at<lb/> present appears the least promising of its issues.<lb/></p>
            </div>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI>
