<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="../../../Schema,%20CSS%20and%20Template%20Files/YB_schema2.rnc" type="application/relax-ng-compact-syntax"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Yellow Nineties 2.0</title>
            <title>The Yellow Book: An Illustrated Quarterly, Volume 1 April 1894</title>
            <title type="YBV1_beerbohm_defense"/>
            <editor>Lorraine Janzen Kooistra</editor>
         </titleStmt>
         <editionStmt>
            <p>
               <date>2019</date>
            </p>
         </editionStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <idno>YBV1_9pr</idno>
            <publisher>Yellow Nineties 2.0</publisher>
            <pubPlace>Ryerson University Centre for Digital Humanities</pubPlace>
            <address>
               <addrLine>English Department</addrLine>
               <addrLine>350 Victoria Street,</addrLine>
               <addrLine>Toronto ON,</addrLine>
               <addrLine>M5B 2K3</addrLine>
               <addrLine>Canada</addrLine>
            </address>
            <availability>
               <p>Usable according to the Creative Commons License <ref
                     target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/">Attribution
                     Non-commercial Share-alike</ref>.</p>
            </availability>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <biblStruct>
               <monogr>
                  <editor>
                     <persName>Henry Harland &amp; Aubrey Beardsley</persName>
                  </editor>
                  <author>Max Beerbohm</author>
                  <title>A Defence of Cosmetics</title>
                  <imprint>
                     <publisher>Elkin Mathews &amp; John Lane</publisher>
                     <pubPlace> London </pubPlace>
                     <publisher>Copeland &amp; Day</publisher>
                     <pubPlace>Boston</pubPlace>
                     <date>April 1894</date>
                     <biblScope>Beerbohm, Max. "A Defence of Cosmetics." <emph rend="italic">The
                        Yellow Book</emph>, vol. 1, April 1894, pp. 65-82. <emph rend="italic">Yellow Book Digital Edition</emph>, edited by Dennis Denisoff and Lorraine Janzen Kooistra, 2010-2014. <emph rend="italic">Yellow Nineties 2.0</emph>,
                        Ryerson University Centre for Digital Humanities, 2019. https://1890s.ca/YBV1_beerbohm_defense </biblScope>
                  </imprint>
               </monogr>
            </biblStruct>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <editorialDecl>
            <p>Introduction. The Yellow Nineties Online publishes primary texts from the 1890s and
               secondary texts written by critics of fin-de-siècle culture. Both kinds of texts are
               marked up in TEI. As a dynamic structure, a scholarly website is always in process.
               Our decisions in selecting and presenting materials on The Yellow Nineties Online are
               governed by the following principles. Editorial Principles 1. Primary materials Our
               editorial method for the facsimile editions published here is informed by social-text
               editing principles. The editors understand text as including visual and verbal
               printed material, including non-referential physical elements such as page design,
               ornament, and binding. We view any text as the outcome of a collaborative process
               that has specific material manifestations at precise historical moments. We have
               chosen to reproduce The Yellow Book in facsimile form at its moment of first
               publication. The social moment—and our editorial horizon—is demarcated by the decade
               of the 1890s as experienced in and around the London contexts of The Yellow Book’s
               contributors and associates. The project’s principal interest is in presenting the
               text’s physical components in its first edition, with attention to its production and
               reception. Copy-text for The Yellow Book and any other primary material edited on The
               Yellow Nineties Online is the first edition unless otherwise noted. The Yellow Book
               is presented in facsimile, using double-page opening of the flip-book function. In
               addition, the physical features, verbal texts, and visual images of each Yellow Book
               volume are marked up in TEI and available in both xml and PDF formats. Annotations to
               the facsimile edition are kept to a minimum. Commentary is available in the site’s
               associated secondary materials. 2. Secondary materials In addition to providing the
               publication vehicle for the marked-up facsimile edition of The Yellow Book, The
               Yellow Nineties Online is also an electronic publishing site for peer-reviewed
               material relating to The Yellow Book and fin-de-siècle cultural studies. Secondary
               material published on the site has three levels of review. First, the editors solicit
               and co-edit commentary from leading scholars in the field. Second, the site is
               overseen by an international Editorial Board of experts. Third, the site will be
               submitted to NINES (Networked Interface for Nineteenth-Century Electronic
               Scholarship) for blind vetting in 2011. Once accepted by NINES, The Yellow Nineties
               Online will be associated with a large consortium of electronic scholarship and
               available for aggregated searches online. At this time, the editors’ priority in
               selecting secondary material is to make available a biography for each person who
               contributed to, or was associated with, the individual volumes of The Yellow Book.
               Each of these biographies is accompanied by a list of writings by, and about, the
               contributor. The editors also seek to publish high-quality essays on relevant aspects
               of The Yellow Book’s production and reception as an illustrated periodical. We are
               particularly interested in material relating to the aesthetic, bibliographic,
               cultural, institutional, personal, and technological contexts of its publication.
               Editorial Guidelines for Contributors of Biographies 1. FORMAT and CONTENT TEMPLATE
               Person’s Name: FIRST, LAST (BIRTH AND DEATH DATE) (flush left) i.e. Ella D’Arcy
               (1851-1939) Biographical Entry: Begins flush left, immediately under person’s name.
               Left justified, single-spaced. 500 - 1000 words. Entries should include the
               following: a) Brief biographical details focusing on early education, training, and
               important influences. b) Extended commentary on career, including important
               contributions to literary, artistic, cultural, social and/or publishing history. Keep
               quotations from other sources to a minimum. c) Connections to key works, events, and
               participants of the Victorian fin de siècle particularly warrant mention. 2. STYLE
               All notes, essays, and other editorial apparatuses in The Yellow Nineties Online
               follow the MLA Style Guide (6th ed.). Book titles are italicized, not underlined.
               Comma before “and” in a serial list (i.e. red, gold, and green). The Yellow Book, not
               the Yellow Book. Acceptable abbrev.: YB Preferred font is Arial 12. The spelling
               standard is Canadian. </p>
         </editorialDecl>
      </encodingDesc>
      <profileDesc>
         <creation>
            <date>1894</date>
         </creation>
         <langUsage>
            <language ident="en">English</language>
         </langUsage>
         <textClass>
            <keywords scheme="#lcsh">
               <list>
                  <item>English literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals</item>
                  <item>Great Britain -- Periodicals</item>
               </list>
            </keywords>
            <keywords scheme="ninesGenre">
               <list>
                  <item>Nonfiction</item>
                  <note>Possible Genres (multiple): "Fiction," "Nonfiction," "Poetry," "Paratext" (TOC, prospecti, advertisements, frontmatter, titlepage), "Review" (older reviews),
                     "Criticism" (including critical introductions), "Visual Art" (images, bio images), Historiography (bios),"Bibliography"
                     (intros, crit, bios, anything with a bibliography attached), "Drama," "Ephemera," "Translation," "Religion," 
                     "Travel Writing," "Music, Other,")
                     <!--Add items as necessary. Remove items not used.-->
                  </note>
               </list>
            </keywords>
            
            <keywords scheme="ninesType">
               <list>
                  <item>Periodical</item>
                  <note>Possible Types (singular): "Periodical" (texts/most stuff), "Interactive Resource" (current writing, 
                     biographies, not old reviews), "Still Image" (images, visual art), "Physical Object" (posters,
                     prospecti)</note>
                  <!-- only choose one item-->
               </list>
            </keywords>
            
            <keywords scheme="ninesDiscipline">
               <list>
                  <item>Book History</item>
                  <note>Possible Disciplines (multiple): "Book History (include for all periodical items)," "Literature," "Art History (use for art, also use for reviews)," "History (don't use in a general sense)," "Theatre Studies,"
                     "Musicology," "Philosophy," "Anthropology," "Science"</note>
                  <!--Add items as necessary. Remove items not used.-->
               </list>
            </keywords>
         </textClass>
      </profileDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text>
      <body>
         <div n="YBV1_9pr" type="prose">
            <pb n="75"/>
            <head rend="case(title)align(left)size(18pt)">
               <title level="a">A Defence of Cosmetics</title>
            </head>
            <byline>By <docAuthor>
                  <ref target="#MBE">Max Beerbohm</ref>
               </docAuthor>
            </byline>
            <p>
               <hi rend="dropcaps">N</hi>
               <hi rend="all caps">AY</hi> but it is useless to protest. Artifice must queen it
               once<lb/> more in the town, and so, if there be any whose hearts chafe<lb/> at her
               return, let them not say, <q>"We have come into evil times,"</q>
               <lb/> and be all for resistance, reformation or angry cavilling. For did<lb/> the
               king's sceptre send the sea retrograde, or the wand of the<lb/> sorcerer avail to
               turn the sun from its old course ? And what <lb/> man or what number of men ever
               stayed that reiterated process by <lb/> which the cities of this world grow, are very
               strong, fail and grow<lb/> again ? Indeed, indeed, there is charm in every period,
               and only <lb/> fools and flutterpates do not seek reverently for what is charming
               <lb/> in their own day. No martyrdom, however fine, nor satire, how <lb/> ever
               splendidly bitter, has changed by a little tittle the known <lb/> tendency of things.
               It is the times that can perfect us, not we <lb/> the times, and so let all of us
               wisely acquiesce. Like the little<lb/> wired marionettes, let us acquiesce in the
               dance.</p>
            <p>For behold ! The Victorian era comes to its end and the day<lb/> of sancta
               simplicitas is quite ended. The old signs are here and<lb/> the portents to warn the
               seer of life that we are ripe for a new<lb/> epoch of artifice. Are not men rattling
               the dice-box and ladies <lb/> dipping their fingers in the rouge-pots ? At <placeName
                  type="city ">Rome</placeName>, in the keenest<lb/> time of her degringolade, when
               there was gambling even in the holy<lb/>
               <fw type="catchword">temples,</fw>
               <pb n="76"/>
               <fw type="pageNum">66</fw>
               <fw type="runningHead">A Defence of Cosmetics</fw> temples, great ladies (does not
                  <persName type="nonfictional">Lucian</persName> tell us ?) did not scruple to
               <lb/> squander all they had upon unguents from <placeName type="region"
                  >Arabia</placeName>. <persName type="nonfictional">Nero</persName>'s mistress
               <lb/> and unhappy wife, <persName type="nonfictional">Poppaea</persName>, of shameful
               memory, had in her travel <lb/> ling retinue fifteen -or, as some say, fifty-
               she-asses, for the sake <lb/> of their milk, that was thought an incomparable guard
               against<lb/> cosmetics with poison in them. Last century, too, when life was<lb/>
               lived by candle-light, and ethics was but etiquette, and even art a<lb/> question of
               punctilio, women, we know, gave the best hours of the<lb/> day to the crafty farding
               of their faces and the towering of their<lb/> coiffures. And men, throwing passion
               into the wine-bowl to sink<lb/> or swim, turned out thought to browse upon the green
               cloth.<lb/> Cannot we even now in our fancy see them, those silent exquisites<lb/>
               round the long table at <placeName type="club">Brooks</placeName> , masked, all of
               them, <q>"lest the<lb/> countenance should betray feeling,"</q> in quinze masks,
               through<lb/> whose eyelets they sat peeping, peeping, while macao brought them<lb/>
               riches or ruin ? We can see them, those silent rascals, sitting there<lb/> with their
               cards and their rouleaux and their wooden money-<lb/> bowls, long after the dawn had
               crept up <placeName type="street">St. James</placeName> and pressed its<lb/> haggard
               face against the window of the little club. Yes, we can<lb/> raise their ghosts—and,
               more, we can see manywhere a devotion<lb/> to hazard fully as meek as theirs. In
                  <placeName type="country">England</placeName> there has been a<lb/> wonderful
               revival of cards. Roulette may rival dead faro in the<lb/> tale of her devotees. Her
               wheel is spinning busily in every house<lb/> and ere long it may be that tender
               parents will be writing to<lb/> complain of the compulsory baccarat in our public
               school.</p>
            <p>In fact, we are all gamblers once more, but our gambling is on<lb/> a finer scale
               than ever it was. We fly from the card-room to the<lb/> heath, and from the heath to
               the City, and from the City to the<lb/> coast of the <placeName type="region"
                  >Mediterranean</placeName>. And just as no one seriously en-<lb/> courages the
               clergy in its frantic efforts to lay the spirit of chance,<lb/> that has thus
               resurged among us, so no longer are many faces set<lb/>
               <fw type="catchword">against</fw>
               <pb n="77"/>
               <fw type="runningHead">By Max Beerbohm</fw>
               <fw type="pageNum">67</fw> against that other great sign of a more complicated life,
               the love<lb/> for cosmetics. No longer is a lady of fashion blamed if, to escape<lb/>
               the outrageous persecution of time, she fly for sanctuary to the<lb/> toilet-table ;
               and if a damosel, prying in her mirror, be sure that<lb/> with brush and pigment she
               can trick herself into more charm, we<lb/> are not angry. Indeed, why should we ever
               have been ? Surely<lb/> it is laudable, this wish to make fair the ugly and overtop
               fairness,<lb/> and no wonder that within the last five years the trade of the<lb/>
               makers of cosmetics has increased immoderately—twentyfold, so<lb/> one of these
               makers has said to me. We need but walk down<lb/> any modish street and peer into the
               little broughams that flit<lb/> past, or (in <persName type="nonfictional"
                  >Thackeray</persName>'s phrase) under the bonnet of any woman<lb/> we meet, to see
               over how wide a kingdom rouge reigns. We<lb/> men, who, from <persName
                  type="nonfictional">Juvenal</persName> down to that discourteous painter of<lb/>
               whom <persName type="nonfictional">Lord Chesterfield</persName> tells us, have
               especially shown a dislike of<lb/> cosmetics, are quite yielding ; and there are, I
               fancy, many such<lb/> husbands as he who, suddenly realising that his wife was
               painted,<lb/> bad her sternly, <q>"Go up and take it all off,"</q> and, on her
               reappear<lb/> ance, bad her with increasing sternness, <q>"Go up and put it all<lb/>
                  on again."</q>
            </p>
            <p>But now that the use of pigments is becoming general, and<lb/> most women are not so
               young as they are painted, it may be asked<lb/> curiously how the prejudice ever came
               into being. Indeed, it is<lb/> hard to trace folly, for that it is inconsequent, to
               its start ; and<lb/> perhaps it savours too much of reason to suggest that the
               prejudice<lb/> was due to the tristful confusion man has made of soul and
               surface.<lb/> Through trusting so keenly to the detection of the one by keeping<lb/>
               watch upon the other, and by force of the thousand errors following,<lb/> he has come
               to think of surface even as the reverse of soul. He<lb/> supposes that every clown
               beneath his paint and lip-salve is moribund<lb/> and knows it, (though in verity, I
               am told, clowns are as cheerful<lb/>
               <fw type="catchword">a</fw>
               <pb n="78"/>
               <fw type="pageNum">68</fw>
               <fw type="runningHead">A Defence of Cosmetics</fw> a class of men as any other), that
               the fairer the fruit's rind and the<lb/> more delectable its bloom, the closer are
               packed the ashes within it.<lb/> The very jargon of the hunting-field connects
               cunning with a<lb/> mask. And so perhaps came man's anger at the embellishment
               of<lb/> women—that lovely mask of enamel with its shadows of pink<lb/> and tiny
               pencilled veins, what must lurk behind it ? Of what<lb/> treacherous mysteries may it
               not be the screen ? Does not the<lb/> heathen lacquer her dark face, and the harlot
               paint her cheeks,<lb/> because sorrow has made them pale ?</p>
            <p>After all, the old prejudice is a-dying. We need not pry into<lb/> the secret of its
               birth. Rather is this a time of jolliness and glad<lb/> indulgence. For the era of
               rouge is upon us, and as only in an<lb/> elaborate era can man by the tangled
               accrescency of his own<lb/> pleasures and emotions reach that refinement which is his
               highest<lb/> excellence, and by making himself, so to say, independent of<lb/>
               Nature, come nearest to God, so only in an elaborate era is woman<lb/> perfect.
               Artifice is the strength of the world, and in that same<lb/> mask of paint and
               powder, shadowed with vermeil tinct and most<lb/> trimly pencilled, is woman's
               strength.</p>
            <p>For see ! We need not look so far back to see woman under<lb/> the direct influence
               of Nature. Early in this century, our grand<lb/> mothers, sickening of the odour of
               faded exotics and spilt wine,<lb/> came out into the daylight once more and let the
               breezes blow<lb/> around their faces and enter, sharp and welcome, into their
               lungs.<lb/> Artifice they drove forth, and they set <persName type="nonfictional"
                  >Martin Tupper</persName> upon a<lb/> throne of mahogany to rule over them. A very
               reign of terror set<lb/> in. All things were sacrificed to the fetish Nature. Old
               ladies<lb/> may still be heard to tell how, when they were girls, affectation<lb/>
               was not ; and, if we verify their assertion in the light of such<lb/> literary
               authorities as <persName type="nonfictional">Dickens</persName>, we find that it is
               absolutely true.<lb/> Women appear to have been in those days utterly natural in their<lb/>
               <fw type="catchword">conduct</fw>
               <pb n="79"/>
               <fw type="runningHead">By Max Beerbohm</fw>
               <fw type="pageNum">69</fw> conduct—flighty, gushing, blushing, fainting, giggling and
               shaking<lb/> their curls. They knew no reserve in the first days of the<lb/>
               Victorian era. No thought was held too trivial, no emotion too<lb/> silly, to
               express. To Nature everything was sacrificed. Great<lb/> heavens! And in those barren
               days what influence was exerted<lb/> by women? By men they seem not to have been
               feared nor loved,<lb/> but regarded rather as <q>"dear little creatures"</q> or <q>"
                  wonderful little<lb/> beings,"</q> and in their relation to life as foolish and
               ineffectual as the<lb/> landscapes they did in water-colour. Yet, if the women of
               those<lb/> years were of no great account, they had a certain charm and they<lb/> at
               least had not begun to trespass upon men's ground ; if they<lb/> touched not thought,
               which is theirs by right, at any rate they<lb/> refrained from action, which is ours.
               Far more serious was it<lb/> when, in the natural trend of time, they became
               enamoured of<lb/> rinking and archery and galloping along the <placeName
                  type="street">Brighton Parade</placeName>.<lb/> Swiftly they have sped on since
               then from horror to horror. The<lb/> invasion of the tennis-courts and of the
               golf-links, the seizure of<lb/> the tricycle and of the type-writer, were but steps
               preliminary in<lb/> that campaign which is to end with the final victorious
               occupation<lb/> of <placeName type="church">St. Stephen's</placeName>. But stay ! The
               horrific pioneers of womanhood<lb/> who gad hither and thither and, confounding
               wisdom with the<lb/> device on her shield, shriek for the unbecoming, are
               doomed.<lb/> Though they spin their tricycle-treadles so amazingly fast, they<lb/>
               are too late. Though they scream victory, none follow them.<lb/> Artifice, that fair
               exile, has returned.</p>
            <p>Yes, though the pioneers know it not, they are doomed already.<lb/> For of the
               curiosities of history not the least strange is the manner<lb/> in which two social
               movements may be seen to overlap, long after<lb/> the second has, in truth, given its
               deathblow to the first. And,<lb/> in like manner as one has seen the limbs of a
               murdered thing in<lb/> lively movement, so we need not doubt that, though the voices of<lb/>
               <fw type="footer"> The Yellow Book, Vol. I <emph>E</emph>
               </fw>
               <fw type="catchword">those</fw>
               <pb n="80"/>
               <fw type="pageNum">70</fw>
               <fw type="runningHead">A Defence of Cosmetics</fw> those who cry out for reform be
               very terribly shrill, they will soon<lb/> be hushed. Dear Artifice is with us. It
               needed but that we <lb/> should wait.</p>
            <p>Surely, without any of my pleading, women will welcome their<lb/> great and amiable
               protectrix, as by instinct. For (have I not<lb/> said ?) it is upon her that all
               their strength, their life almost,<lb/> depends. Artifice's first command to them is
               that they should<lb/> repose. With bodily activity their powder will fly, their
               enamel<lb/> crack. They are butterflies who must not flit, if they love their<lb/>
               bloom. Now, setting aside the point of view of passion, from<lb/> which very many
               obvious things might be said, (and probably have<lb/> been by the minor poets), it
               is, from the intellectual point of<lb/> view, quite necessary that a woman should
               repose. Hers is the<lb/> resupinate sex. On her couch she is a goddess, but so soon
               as<lb/> ever she put her foot to the ground—lo, she is the veriest little<lb/>
               sillypop and quite done for. She cannot rival us in accion, but she<lb/> is our
               mistress in the things of the mind. Let her not by second-<lb/> rate athletics, nor
               indeed by any exercise soever of the limbs,<lb/> spoil the pretty procedure of her
               reason. Let her be content to<lb/> remain the guide, the subtle suggester of what
                  <emph rend="italic">we</emph> must do, the<lb/> strategist whose soldiers we are,
               the little architect whose work<lb/> men.</p>
            <p>
               <q>" After all,"</q> as a pretty girl once said to me, <q>"women are a sex<lb/> by
                  themselves, so to speak,"</q> and the sharper the line between <lb/> their worldly
               functions and ours, the better. This greater<lb/> swiftness and less erring subtlety
               of mind, their forte and privilege,<lb/> justifies the painted mask that Artifice
               bids them wear. Behind<lb/> it their minds can play without let. They gain the
               strength of<lb/> reserve. They become important, as in the days of the Roman<lb/>
               Empire were the Emperor's mistresses, as was the <persName type="nonfictional"
                  >Pompadour</persName> at<lb/>
               <placeName type="residence">Versailles</placeName>, as was our <persName
                  type="nonfictional">Elizabeth</persName>. Yet do not their faces become<lb/>
               <fw type="catchword">lined</fw>
               <pb n="81"/>
               <fw type="runningHead">By Max Beerbohm</fw>
               <fw type="pageNum">71</fw> lined with thought ; beautiful and without meaning are
               their<lb/> faces.</p>
            <p>And, truly, of all the good things that will happen with the<lb/> full renascence of
               cosmetics, one of the best is that surface will<lb/> finally be severed from soul.
               That damnable confusion will be<lb/> solved by the extinguishing of a prejudice
               which, as I suggest,<lb/> itself created. Too long has the face been degraded from
               its rank<lb/> as a thing of beauty to a mere vulgar index of character or<lb/>
               emotion. We had come to troubling ourselves, not with its<lb/> charm of colour and
               line, but with such questions as whether the<lb/> lips were sensuous, the eyes full
               of sadness, the nose indicative of<lb/> determination. I have no quarrel with
               physiognomy. For my<lb/> own part, I believe in it. But it has tended to degrade the
               face<lb/> Aesthetically, in such wise as the study of cheirosophy has tended<lb/> to
               degrade the hand. And the use of cosmetics, the masking of<lb/> the face, will change
               this. We shall gaze at a woman merely<lb/> because she is beautiful, not stare into
               her face anxiously, as into<lb/> the face of a barometer.</p>
            <p>How fatal it has been, in how many ways, this confusion of<lb/> soul and surface !
               Wise were the Greeks in making plain masks<lb/> for their mummers to play in, and
               dunces we not to have done the<lb/> same ! Only the other day, an actress was saying
               that what she<lb/> was most proud of in her art—next, of course, to having
               appeared<lb/> in some provincial pantomime at the age of three—was the deft<lb/> ness
               with which she contrived, in parts demanding a rapid succes-<lb/> sion of emotions,
               to dab her cheeks quite quickly with rouge from<lb/> the palm of her right hand, or
               powder from the palm of her left.<lb/> Gracious goodness! why do not we have masks
               upon the stage ?<lb/> Drama is the presentment of the soul in action. The mirror
               of<lb/> the soul is the voice. Let the young critics, who seek a cheap<lb/>
               reputation for austerity, by cavilling at <q>" incidental music,"</q> set<lb/>
               <fw type="catchword">their</fw>
               <pb n="82"/>
               <fw type="pageNum">72</fw>
               <fw type="runningHead">A Defence of Cosmetics</fw> their faces rather against the
               attempt to justify inferior dramatic<lb/> art by the subvention of a quite alien art
               like painting, of any art,<lb/> indeed, whose sphere is only surface. Let those,
               again, who sneer,<lb/> so rightly, at the <q>" painted anecdotes of the Academy,"</q>
               censure<lb/> equally the writers who trespass on painter's ground. It is a<lb/>
               proclaimed sin that a painter should concern himself with a good<lb/> little girl's
               affection for a Scotch greyhound, or the keen enjoyment<lb/> of their port by elderly
               gentlemen of the early forties. Yet, for a<lb/> painter to prod the soul with his
               paint-brush is no worse than for<lb/> a novelist to refuse to dip under the surface,
               and the fashion of<lb/> avoiding a psychological study of grief by stating that the
               owner's<lb/> hair turned white in a single night, or of shame by mentioning a<lb/>
               sudden rush of scarlet to the cheeks, is as lamentable as may<lb/> be. But ! But with
               the universal use of cosmetics and the<lb/> consequent secernment of soul and
               surface, which, at the risk of<lb/> irritating a reader, I must again insist upon,
               all those old properties<lb/> that went to bolster up the ordinary novel the
               trembling lips, the<lb/> flashing eyes, the determined curve of the chin, the nervous
               trick of<lb/> biting the moustache—aye and the hectic spot of red on either<lb/>
               cheek—will be made spiflicate, as the puppets were spiflicated by<lb/>
               <persName type="fictional">Don Quixote</persName>. Yes, even now <persName
                  type="fictional">Demos</persName> begins to discern. The same<lb/> spirit that has
               revived rouge, smote his mouth as it grinned at<lb/> the wondrous painter of mist and
               river, and now sends him<lb/> sprawling for the pearls that <persName
                  type="fictional">Meredith</persName> dived for in the deep<lb/> waters of
               romance.</p>
            <p>Indeed the revival of cosmetics must needs be so splendid an<lb/> influence,
               conjuring boons innumerable, that one inclines almost<lb/> to mutter against that
               inexorable law by which Artifice must<lb/> perish from time to time. That such
               branches of painting as the<lb/> staining of glass or the illuminating of manuscripts
               should fall into<lb/> disuse seems, in comparison, so likely ; these were esoteric
               arts ;<lb/>
               <fw type="catchword">they</fw>
               <pb n="83"/>
               <fw type="runningHead">By Max Beerbohm</fw>
               <fw type="pageNum">73</fw> they died with the monastic spirit. But personal
               appearance is<lb/> art's very basis. The painting of the face is the first kind
               of<lb/> painting man can have known. To make beautiful things<lb/> is it not an
               impulse laid upon few ? But to make oneself beautiful<lb/> is an universal instinct.
               Strange that the resultant art could ever<lb/> perish ! So fascinating an art too !
               So various in its materials<lb/> from stimmis, psimythium and fuligo to bismuth and
               arsenic, so<lb/> simple in that its ground and its subject-matter are one, so<lb/>
               marvellous in that its very subject-matter becomes lovely when an<lb/> artist has
               selected it ! For surely this is no idle nor fantastic<lb/> saying. To deny that
                  <q>"making-up"</q> is an art, on the pretext<lb/> that the finished work of its
               exponents depends for beauty and<lb/> excellence upon the ground chosen for the work,
               is absurd. At<lb/> the touch of a true artist, the plainest face turns comely.
               As<lb/> subject-matter the face is no more than suggestive, as ground,<lb/> merely a
               loom round which the beatus artifex may spin the<lb/> threads of any golden fabric
               :</p>
            <p><quote xml:lang="la">Quae nunc nomen habent operosi signa Maronis<lb/>
                  <emph rend="indent"/> Pondus iners quondam duraque massa fuit.<lb/> Multa viros
                  nescire decet ; pars maxima rerum<lb/>
                  <emph rend="indent"/>Offendat, si non interiora tegas,</quote></p>
            <p>and, as <persName type="nonfictional">Ovid</persName> would seem to suggest, by
               pigments any tone may be<lb/> set aglow on a woman's cheek, from enamel the features
               take any<lb/> form. Insomuch that surely the advocates of soup-kitchens and<lb/>
               free-libraries and other devices for giving people what providence<lb/> did not mean
               them to receive, should send out pamphlets in the<lb/> praise of self-embellishment.
               For it will place Beauty within<lb/> easy reach of many who could not otherwise hope
               to attain it </p>
            <p>But of course Artifice is rather exacting. In return for the<lb/> repose she forces
               so—wisely !—upon her followers when the sun is<lb/>
               <fw type="catchword">high</fw>
               <pb n="84"/>
               <fw type="pageNum">74</fw>
               <fw type="runningHead">A Defence of Cosmetics</fw> high or the moon is blown across
               heaven, she demands that<lb/> they should pay her long homage at the sun's rising.
               The initiate<lb/> may not enter lightly upon her mysteries. For, if a bad com-<lb/>
               plexion be inexcusable, to be ill-painted is unforgivable; and when<lb/> the toilet
               is laden once more with the fulness of its elaboration, we<lb/> shall hear no more of
               the proper occupation for women. And<lb/> think, how sweet an energy, to sit at the
               mirror of coquetry !<lb/> See the dear merits of the toilet as shown upon old vases,
               or upon<lb/> the walls of Roman dwellings, or, rather still, read <persName
                  type="nonfictional">Bottiger's</persName>
               <lb/> alluring, scholarly description of <q>"<foreign xml:lang="de">Morgenscenen im
                     Puttzimmer<lb/> Einer Reichen Römerin.</foreign>"</q> Read of <persName
                  type="nonfictional">Sabina</persName>'s face as she comes <lb/> through the
               curtain of her bed-chamber to the chamber of her <lb/> toilet. The slave-girls have
               long been charing their white feet<lb/> upon the marble floor. They stand, those
               timid Greek girls,<lb/> marshalled in little battalions. Each has her appointed task,
               and<lb/> all kneel in welcome as <persName type="nonfictional">Sabina</persName>
               stalks, ugly and frowning, to the<lb/> toilet chair. <persName type="nonfictional"
                  >Scaphion</persName> steps forth from among them, and, dipping a<lb/> tiny sponge
               in a bowl of hot milk, passes it lightly, ever so lightly,<lb/> over her mistress
               face. The Poppaean pastes melt beneath it like<lb/> snow. A cooling lotion is poured
               over her brow and is fanned<lb/> with feathers. <persName type="nonfictional"
                  >Phiale</persName> comes after, a clever girl, captured in some<lb/> sea-skirmish
               in the <placeName type="water">Aegean</placeName>. In her left hand she holds the
               ivory<lb/> box wherein are the phucus and that white powder, psimythium;<lb/> in her
               right a sheaf of slim brushes. With how sure a touch does<lb/> she mingle the
               colours, and in what sweet proportion blushes<lb/> and blanches her lady's upturned
               face. <persName type="nonfictional">Phiale</persName> is the cleverest of all<lb/>
               the slaves. Now <persName type="nonfictional">Calamis</persName> dips her quill in a
               certain powder that<lb/> floats, liquid and sable, in the hollow of her palm.
               Standing upon<lb/> tip-toe and with lips parted, she traces the arch of the
               eyebrows.<lb/> The slaves whisper loudly of their lady's beauty, and two of them<lb/>
               hold up a mirror to her. Yes, the eyebrows are rightly arched.<lb/>
               <fw type="catchword">But</fw>
               <pb n="85"/>
               <fw type="runningHead">By Max Beerbohm</fw>
               <fw type="pageNum">75</fw> But why does <persName type="nonfictional"
                  >Psecas</persName> abase herself? She is craving leave to powder<lb/>
               <persName type="nonfictional">Sabina</persName>'s hair with a fine new powder. It is
               made of the grated rind<lb/> of the cedar-tree, and a Gallic perfumer, whose stall is
               near the<lb/>
               <placeName type="theatre">Circus</placeName>, gave it to her for a kiss. No lady in
                  <placeName type="city">Rome</placeName> knows of it.<lb/> And so, when four
               special slaves have piled up the head-dress, out<lb/> of a perforated box this
               glistening powder is showered. Into every<lb/> little brown ringlet it enters, till
                  <persName type="nonfictional">Sabina</persName>'s hair seems like a pile of<lb/>
               gold coins. Lest the breezes send it flying, the girls lay the<lb/> powder with
               sprinkled attar. Soon <persName type="nonfictional">Sabina</persName> will start for the<lb/>
               <placeName type="church">Temple of Cybele</placeName>.</p>
            <p>Ah ! Such are the lures of the toilet that none will for long<lb/> hold aloof from
               them. Cosmetics are not going to be a mere<lb/> prosaic remedy for age or plainness,
               but all ladies and all young girls<lb/> will come to love them. Does not a certain
               blithe <persName type="nonfictional">Marquise</persName>,<lb/> whose <foreign
                  xml:lang="fr" rend="italic">lettres intimes</foreign> from the Court of <persName
                  type="nonfictional">Louis Seize</persName> are less read<lb/> than their wit would
               merit, tell us how she was scandalised to see<lb/>
               <q>"<foreign xml:lang="fr" rend="italic">même les toutes jeunes demoiselles émaillées
                     comme ma tabatière?</foreign>"</q>
               <lb/> So it shall be with us. Surely the common prejudice against<lb/> painting the
               lily can but be based on mere ground of economy.<lb/> That which is already fair is
               complete, it may be urged—urged<lb/> implausibly, for there are not so many lovely
               things in this world<lb/> that we can afford not to know each one of them by
               heart.<lb/> There is only one white lily, and who that has ever seen—as I have<lb/> a
               lily—really well painted could grudge the artist so fair a ground<lb/> for his skill
               ? Scarcely do you believe through how many nice<lb/> metamorphoses a lily may be
               passed by him. In like manner, we<lb/> all know the young girl, with her simpleness,
               her goodness, her<lb/> wayward ignorance. And a very charming ideal for <placeName
                  type="country">England</placeName>
               <lb/> must she have been, and a very natural one, when a young girl<lb/> sat even on
               the throne. But no nation can keep its ideal for ever<lb/> and it needed none of
                  <persName type="nonfictional">Mr. Gilbert</persName>'s delicate satire in
                     <q>"<title level="m">Utopia</title>"</q> to<lb/>
               <fw type="catchword">remind</fw>
               <pb n="86"/>
               <fw type="pageNum">76</fw>
               <fw type="runningHead">A Defence of Cosmetics</fw> remind us that she had passed out
               of our ken with the rest of<lb/> the early Victorian era. What writer of plays, as
               lately<lb/> asked some pressman, who had been told off to attend many first<lb/>
               nights and knew what he was talking about, ever dreams of<lb/> making the young girl
               the centre of his theme ? Rather he seeks<lb/> inspiration from the tried and tired
               woman of the world, in all her<lb/> intricate maturity, whilst, by way of comic
               relief, he sends the<lb/> young girl flitting in and out with a tennis-racket, the poor<lb/>
               <foreign xml:lang="el" rend="italic">Ɛίδωλοv ảμɑvрόv</foreign> of her former self.
               The season of the unsophis-<lb/> ticated is gone by, and the young girl's final
               extinction beneath the<lb/> rising tides of cosmetics will leave no gap in life and
               will rob art of<lb/> nothing.</p>
            <p>
               <q>"Tush,"</q> I can hear some damned flutterpate exclaim, <q>"girlish-<lb/> ness and
                  innocence are as strong and as permanent as womanhood<lb/> itself ! Why, a few
                  months past, the whole town went mad over<lb/>
                  <persName type="nonfictional">Miss Cissie Loftus</persName>! Was not hers a
                  success of girlish innocence<lb/> and the absence of rouge? If such things as
                  these be outmoded,<lb/> why was she so wildly popular?"</q> Indeed, the triumph of
               that<lb/> clever girl, whose dbut made <placeName type="city">London</placeName> nice
               even in August, is but<lb/> another witness to the truth of my contention. In a
               very<lb/> sophisticated time, simplicity has a new dulcedo. Hers was a<lb/> success
               of contrast. Accustomed to clever malaperts like <persName type="nonfictional"
                  >Miss<lb/> Lloyd</persName> or <persName type="nonfictional">Miss
               Reeve</persName>, whose experienced pouts and smiles under<lb/> the sun-bonnet are a
               standing burlesque of innocence and girlish-<lb/> ness, <persName type="fictional"
                  >Demos</persName> was really delighted, for once and away, to see the<lb/> real
               presentment of these things upon his stage. Coming after all<lb/> those sly series,
               coming so young and mere with her pink frock<lb/> and straightly combed hair,
                  <persName type="nonfictional">Miss Cissie Loftus</persName> had the charm<lb/>
               which things of another period often do possess. Besides, just as<lb/> we adored her
               for the abrupt nod with which she was wont at<lb/> first to acknowledge the applause,
               so we were glad for her to come<lb/>
               <fw type="catchword">upon</fw>
               <pb n="87"/>
               <fw type="runningHead">By Max Beerbohm</fw>
               <fw type="pageNum">77</fw> upon the stage with nothing to tinge the ivory of her
               cheeks. It<lb/> seemed so strange, that neglect of convention. To be behind<lb/>
               footlights and not rouged ! Yes, hers was a success of<lb/> contrast. She was like a
               daisy in the window at <placeName type="business">Solomons'</placeName>. She<lb/> was
               delightful. And yet, such is the force of convention, that<lb/> when last I saw her,
               playing in some burlesque at the <placeName type="theatre">Gaiety</placeName>,
               her<lb/> fringe was curled and her pretty face rouged with the best of<lb/> them.
               And, if further need be to show the absurdity of having<lb/> called her performance
                  <q>"a triumph of naturalness over the jaded<lb/> spirit of modernity"</q> let us
               reflect that the little mimic was not a<lb/> real old-fashioned girl after all. She
               had none of that restless<lb/> naturalness that would seem to have characterised the
               girl of the<lb/> early Victorian days. She had no pretty ways—no smiles—nor<lb/>
               blushes nor tremors. Possibly <persName type="fictional">Demos</persName> could not
               have stood a pre-<lb/> sentment of girlishness unrestrained.</p>
            <p>But with her grave insouciance, <persName type="nonfictional">Miss Cissie
                  Loftus</persName> had much<lb/> of the reserve that is one of the factors of
               feminine perfection, and<lb/> to most comes only, as I have said, with artifice. Her
               features<lb/> played very, very slightly. And in truth, this may have been one<lb/>
               of the reasons of her great success. For expression is but too<lb/> often the ruin of
               a face ; and, since we cannot as yet so order the<lb/> circumstances of life that
               women shall never be betrayed into <q>"an<lb/> unbecoming emotion,"</q> when the
               brunette shall never have cause<lb/> to blush, and the lady who looks well with
               parted lips be kept in a<lb/> permanent state of surprise, the safest way by far is
               to create, by<lb/> brush and pigments, artificial expressions for every face.</p>
            <p>And this—say you?—will make monotony? You are mis-<lb/> taken, toto ccelo mistaken.
               When your mistress has wearied you<lb/> with one expression, then it will need but a
               few touches of that<lb/> pencil, a backward sweep of that brush, and lo, you will
               be<lb/> revelling in another. For though, of course, the painting of the<lb/>
               <fw type="catchword">face</fw>
               <pb n="88"/>
               <fw type="pageNum">78</fw>
               <fw type="runningHead">A Defence of Cosmetics</fw> face is, in manner, most like the
               painting of canvas, in outcome it<lb/> is rather akin to the art of music lasting,
               like music's echo, not<lb/> for very long. So that, no doubt, of the many little
               appurte-<lb/> nances of the Reformed Toilet Table, not the least vital will be<lb/> a
               list of the emotions that become its owner, with recipes for<lb/> simulating them.
               According to the colour she wills her hair to<lb/> be for the time—black or yellow
               or, peradventure, burnished red<lb/> —she will blush for you, sneer for you, laugh or
               languish for you.<lb/> The good combinations of line and colour are nearly
               numberless,<lb/> and by their means poor restless woman will be able to realise
               her<lb/> moods in all their shades and lights and dappledoms, to live many<lb/> lives
               and masquerade through many moments of joy. No mono-<lb/> tony will be. And for us
               men matrimony will have lost its<lb/> sting.</p>
            <p>But be it remembered ! Though we men will garner these<lb/> oblique boons, it is into
               the hands of women that Artifice gives her<lb/> pigments. I know, I know that many
               men in a certain sect of<lb/> society have shown a marked tendency to the use of
               cosmetics. I<lb/> speak not of the countless gentlemen who walk about town in
               the<lb/> time of its desertion from August to October, artificially bronzed,<lb/> as
               though they were fresh from the moors or from the <placeName type="water"
                  >Solent</placeName>.<lb/> This, I conceive, is done for purely social reasons and
               need not<lb/> concern me here. Rather do I speak of those who make them<lb/> selves
               up, seemingly with an aesthetic purpose. Doubtless—I<lb/> wish to be quite just—there
               are many who look the better<lb/> for such embellishment ; but, at the hazard of
               being thought old-<lb/> fashioned and prejudiced, I cannot speak of the custom with
               any<lb/> thing but strong disapproval. If men are to lie among the<lb/> rouge-pots,
               inevitably it will tend to promote that amalgamation of<lb/> the sexes which is one
               of the chief planks in the decadent platform<lb/> and to obtund that piquant contrast
               between him and her, which<lb/>
               <fw type="catchword">is</fw>
               <pb n="89"/>
               <fw type="runningHead">By Max Beerbohm</fw>
               <fw type="pageNum">79</fw> is one of the redeeming features of creation. Besides,
               really, men<lb/> have not the excuse of facial monotony, that holds in the case
               of<lb/> women. Have we not hair upon our chins and upper lips ? And<lb/> can we not,
               by diverting the trend of our moustache or by growing<lb/> our beard in this way or
               that, avoid the boredom of looking the same<lb/> for long ? Let us beware. For if, in
               violation of unwritten<lb/> sexual law, men take to trifling with the paints and
               brushes that<lb/> are feminine heritage, it may be that our great ladies will don
               false<lb/> imperials, and the little doner deck her pretty chin with a Newgate<lb/>
               fringe ! After all, I think we need not fear that many men will<lb/> thus trespass.
               Most of them are in the City nowadays, and the<lb/> great wear and tear of that place
               would put their use of rouge—<lb/> that demands bodily repose from its
               dependents—quite outside the<lb/> range of practical aesthetics.</p>
            <p>But that in the world of women they will not neglect this art,<lb/> so ripping in
               itself, in its result so wonderfully beneficent, I am<lb/> sure indeed. Much, I have
               said, is already done for its full<lb/> renascence. The spirit of the age has made
               straight the path of<lb/> its professors. Fashion has made <persName
                  type="nonfictional">Jezebel</persName> surrender her monopoly<lb/> of the
               rouge-pot. As yet, the great art of self-embellishment is<lb/> for us but in its
               infancy. But if Englishwomen can bring it to<lb/> the flower of an excellence so
               supreme as never yet has it known,<lb/> then, though Old <placeName type="country"
                  >England</placeName> may lose her martial and commercial<lb/> supremacy, we
               patriots will have the satisfaction of knowing that<lb/> she has been advanced at one
               bound to a place in the councils of<lb/> aesthetic <placeName type="region"
                  >Europe</placeName>. And, in sooth, is this hoping too high of my<lb/>
               countrywomen ? True that, as the art seems always to have<lb/> appealed to the ladies
               of <placeName type="city">Athens</placeName>, and it was not until the waning<lb/>
               time of the Republic that Roman ladies learned to love the practice<lb/> of it, so
                  <placeName type="city">Paris</placeName>, Athenian in this as in all other things,
               has been noted<lb/> hitherto as a far more vivid centre of the art than <placeName
                  type="city">London</placeName>. But it was<lb/>
               <fw type="catchword">in</fw>
               <pb n="90"/>
               <fw type="pageNum">80</fw>
               <fw type="runningHead">A Defence of Cosmetics</fw> in <placeName type="city"
                  >Rome</placeName>, under the Emperors, that unguentaria reached its zenith,<lb/>
               and shall it not be in <placeName type="cityc">London</placeName>, soon, that
               unguentaria shall outstrip<lb/> its Roman perfection ? Surely there must be among us
               artists as<lb/> cunning in the use of brush and puff as any who lived at <placeName
                  type="residence"/>Versailles.<lb/> Surely the splendid, impalpable advance of good
               taste, as shown in<lb/> dress and in the decoration of houses, may justify my hope of
               the<lb/> preeminence of Englishwomen in the cosmetic art. By their<lb/> innate
               delicacy of touch they will accomplish much, and much, of<lb/> course, by their swift
               feminine perception. Yet it were well that<lb/> they should know something also of
               the theoretical side of the craft.<lb/> Modern authorities upon the mysteries of the
               toilet are, it is true,<lb/> rather few ; but among the ancients many a writer would
               seem to<lb/> have been fascinated by them. <persName type="nonfictional"
                  >Archigenes</persName>, a man of science at<lb/> the Court of <persName
                  type="nonfictional">Cleopatra</persName>, and Criton at the Court of the Emperor<lb/>
               <persName type="nonfictional">Trajan</persName>, both wrote treatises upon cosmetics
               doubtless most<lb/> scholarly treatises that would have given many a precious
               hint.<lb/> It is a pity they are not extant. From <persName type="nonfictional"
                  >Lucian</persName> or from <persName type="nonfictional">Juvenal</persName>,<lb/>
               with his bitter picture of a Roman <foreign xml:lang="fr" rend="italic"
                  >levée</foreign> , much may be learnt ;<lb/> from the staid pages of <persName
                  type="nonfictional">Xenophon</persName> and <persName type="nonfictional"
                  >Aristophanes</persName>' dear farces.<lb/> But best of all is that fine book of
               the <title level="m" xml:lang="la">Ars Amatoria</title> that <persName
                  type="nonfictional">Ovid</persName>
               <lb/> has set aside for the consideration of dyes, perfumes and pomades.<lb/> Written
               by an artist who knew the allurements of the toilet and<lb/> understood its
               philosophy, it remains without rival as a treatise<lb/> upon Artifice. It is more
               than a poem, it is a manual ; and if<lb/> there be left in <placeName type="country"
                  >England</placeName> any lady who cannot read Latin in the<lb/> original, she will
               do well to procure a discreet translation. In<lb/> the <placeName type="business"
                  >Bodleian Library</placeName> there is treasured the only known copy of a<lb/>
               very poignant and delightful rendering of this one book of <persName
                  type="nonfictional">Ovid</persName>'s<lb/> masterpiece. It was made by a certain
                  <persName type="nonfictional">Wye Waltonstall</persName>, who<lb/> lived in the
               days of <persName type="nonfictional">Elizabeth</persName>, and, seeing that he
               dedicated it to<lb/>
               <q>"the <foreign xml:lang="enm">Vertuous Ladyes and Gentlewomen of <placeName
                        type="country">Great Britain</placeName>
                  </foreign>,"</q> I am<lb/>
               <fw type="catchword">sure</fw>
               <pb n="91"/>
               <fw type="runningHead">By Max Beerbohm</fw>
               <fw type="pageNum">81</fw> sure that the gallant writer, could he know of our great
               renascence<lb/> of cosmetics, would wish his little work to be placed once more<lb/>
               within their reach. <q>"<foreign xml:lang="enm">Inasmuch as to you, ladyes and
                     gentle<lb/> women,</foreign>"</q> so he writes in his queer little dedication,
                     <q>"<foreign xml:lang="enm">my booke of<lb/> pigments doth first addresse
                     itself, that it may kisse your hands and<lb/> afterward have the lines thereof
                     in reading sweetened by the odour<lb/> of your breath, while the dead letters
                     formed into words by your<lb/> divided lips may receive new life by your
                     passionate expression,<lb/> and the words marryed in that Ruby coloured temple
                     may thus<lb/> happily united, multiply your contentment.</foreign>"</q> It is
               rather sad to<lb/> think that, at this crisis in the history of pigments, the
                  <foreign xml:lang="enm">Vertuous<lb/> Ladyes and Gentlewomen</foreign> cannot read
               the libellus of <persName type="nonfictional">Wye Walton-<lb/> stall</persName>, who
               did so dearly love pigments.</p>
            <p>But since the days when these great critics wrote their treatises,<lb/> with what
               gifts innumerable has Artifice been loaded by Science !<lb/> Many little partitions
               must be added to the narthecium before it<lb/> can comprehend all the new cosmetics
               that have been quietly<lb/> devised since classical days, and will make the modern
               toilet chalks<lb/> away more splendid in its possibilities. A pity that no one
               has<lb/> devoted himself to the compiling of a new list ; but doubtless all the<lb/>
               newest devices are known to the admirable unguentarians of <placeName type="street"
                  >Bond<lb/> Street</placeName>, who will impart them to their clients. Our thanks,
               too,<lb/> should be given to Science for ridding us of the old danger that<lb/> was
               latent in the use of cosmetics. Nowadays they cannot, being<lb/> purged of any
               poisonous element, do harm to the skin that they<lb/> make beautiful. There need be
               no more sowing the seeds of<lb/> destruction in the furrows of time, no martyrs to
               the cause like<lb/>
               <persName type="nonfictional">Georgina Gunning</persName>, that fair dame but
               infelix, who died, so they<lb/> relate, from the effect of a poisonous rouge upon her
               lips. No,<lb/> we need have no fears now. Artifice will claim not another<lb/> victim
               from among her worshippers.</p>
            <p>
               <fw type="catchword">Loveliness</fw>
               <pb n="92"/>
               <fw type="pageNum">82</fw>
               <fw type="runningHead">A Defence of Cosmetics</fw> Loveliness shall sit at the
               toilet, watching her oval face in the<lb/> oval mirror. Her smooth fingers shall flit
               among the paints and<lb/> powder, to tip and mingle them, catch up a pencil, clasp a
               phial,<lb/> and what <emph rend="italic">not</emph> and what not, until the mask of
               vermeil tinct has been<lb/> laid aptly, the enamel quite hardened. And, heavens, how
               she will<lb/> charm us and ensorcel our eyes ! Positively rouge will rob us for<lb/>
               a time of all our reason ; we shall go mad over masks. Was it<lb/> not at <placeName
                  type="city">Capua</placeName> that they had a whole street where nothing was
               sold<lb/> but dyes and unguents ? We must have such a street, and, to fill<lb/> our
               new Seplasia, our Arcade of the Unguents, all herbs and minerals<lb/> and live
               creatures shall give of their substance. The white cliffs<lb/> of <placeName
                  type="country">Albion</placeName> shall be ground to powder for loveliness, and
               perfumed<lb/> by the ghost of many a little violet. The fluffy eider-ducks, that<lb/>
               are swimming round the pond, shall lose their feathers, that the<lb/> powder-puff may
               be moonlike as it passes over loveliness's lovely<lb/> face. Even the camels shall
               become ministers of delight, giving<lb/> their hair in many tufts to be stained by
               the paints in her<lb/> colour-box, and across her cheek the swift hare's foot shall
               fly as of<lb/> old. The sea shall offer her the phucus, its scarlet weed. We<lb/>
               shall spill the blood of mulberries at her bidding. And, as in<lb/> another period of
               great ecstasy, a dancing wanton, la belle <ref target="#ABE">Aubrey</ref>,<lb/> was
               crowned upon a <persName type="fictional">Lucy Rimmerton</persName>'s lighted altar,
               so Arsenic, that <q>"green-<lb/> tress'd goddess,"</q> ashamed at length of skulking
               between the soup<lb/> of the unpopular and the test-tubes of the <persName
                  type="nonfictional">Queen</persName>'s analyst, shall be<lb/> exalted to a place
               of highest honour upon loveliness's toilet-table.<lb/> ! All these things shall come
               to pass. Times of jolliness and<lb/> glad indulgence ! For Artifice, whom we drove
               forth, has returned<lb/> among us, and, though her eyes are red with crying, she
               is<lb/> smiling forgiveness. She is kind. Let us dance and be glad, and<lb/> trip the
               cockawhoop ! Artifice, sweetest exile, is come into her<lb/> kingdom. Let us dance
               her a welcome ! </p>
         </div>
      </body>
   </text>
</TEI>
