<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="../../../Schema,%20CSS%20and%20Template%20Files/YB_schema2.rnc" type="application/relax-ng-compact-syntax"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
    <teiHeader>
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title>Yellow Nineties 2.0</title>
                <title>The Yellow Book: An Illustrated Quarterly, Volume 13 April 1897</title>
                <title type="YBV13_gallienne_twoprose"/>
                <editor>Lorraine Janzen Kooistra</editor>
            </titleStmt>
            <editionStmt>
                <p>
                    <date>2020</date>
                </p>
            </editionStmt>
            <publicationStmt>
                <idno>YBV13_45pr</idno>
                <publisher>Yellow Nineties 2.0</publisher>
                <pubPlace>Ryerson University Centre for Digital Humanities</pubPlace>
                <address>
               <addrLine>English Department</addrLine>
               <addrLine>350 Victoria Street,</addrLine>
               <addrLine>Toronto ON,</addrLine>
               <addrLine>M5B 2K3</addrLine>
               <addrLine>Canada</addrLine>
            </address>
                <availability>
                    <p>Usable according to the Creative Commons License <ref
                            target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/">Attribution
                            Non-commercial Share-alike</ref>.</p>
                </availability>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <biblStruct>
                    <monogr>
                        <editor>
                            <persName>Henry Harland</persName>
                        </editor>
                        <author>Richard Le Gallienne</author>
                        <title>Two Prose Fancies</title>
                        <imprint>
                            <publisher>John Lane</publisher>
                            <pubPlace>London</pubPlace>
                            <pubPlace>New York</pubPlace>
                            <date>April 1897</date>
                            <biblScope>Le Gallienne, Richard. "Two Prose Fancies." <emph rend="italic"
                                >The Yellow Book</emph>, vol. 13, April 1897, pp. 308-316. <emph
                                    rend="italic">Yellow Book Digital Edition</emph>, edited by Dennis
                                Denisoff and Lorraine Janzen Kooistra, 2010-2014. <emph rend="italic">Yellow Nineties 2.0</emph>,
                                Ryerson University Centre for Digital Humanities. 
                                https://1890s.ca/YBV13_gallienne_twoprose/ </biblScope>
                        </imprint>
                    </monogr>
                </biblStruct>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
        <encodingDesc>
            <editorialDecl>
                <p>Our editorial method is informed by social-text editing principles. By “text” we mean
                    verbal and visual printed material, including non-referential physical elements such as
                    bindings, page layouts, and ornaments. We view any text as the outcome of collaborative
                    processes that have specific manifestations at precise historical moments.
                    The Yellow Nineties Online publishes facsimile editions of a select collection of fin-de-
                    siècle aesthetic periodicals, together with paratexts of production and reception such as
                    cover designs, advertising materials, and reviews. This historical material is enhanced
                    by two kinds of peer-reviewed scholarly commentary: biographies of the periodicals’
                    contributors and associates; and critical introductions to each title and volume by
                    experts in the field. All scholarly material on the site is vetted by the editor(s) and peer-
                    reviewed by them and/or an international board of advisors. The site as a whole is peer-
                    reviewed by NINES (Networked Infrastructure for Nineteenth-Century Electronic
                    Scholarship). Contributors to the site retain personal copyright in their material. The
                    site is licensed with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0
                    license. Both primary and secondary materials, including all visual images, are marked
                    up in TEI- (Textual-Encoding Initiative) compliant XML (Extensible Markup
                    Language). To ensure maximum flexibility for users, magazines are available on the site
                    as virtual objects (facsimiles) in FlipBook form; in HTML for online reading; in PDF for
                    downloading and collecting; and in XML for those who wish to review and/or adapt our
                    tag sets. In order to make ornamental devices, such as initial letters, head- and tail-
                    pieces, searchable, we have developed a Database of Ornament in OMEKA, and linked it
                    to the relevant pages of each magazine edition. As a dynamic structure, a scholarly
                    website is always in process; Phase One of The Yellow Nineties Online (2010-2015) is
                    completed and Phase Two (2016-2021) is underway.</p>
            </editorialDecl>
        </encodingDesc>
        <profileDesc>
            <creation>
                <date>1897</date>
            </creation>
            <langUsage>
                <language ident="en">English</language>
                <language ident="fr">French</language>
            </langUsage>
            <textClass>
                <keywords scheme="#lcsh">
                    <list>
                        <item>English literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals</item>
                        <item>Great Britain -- Periodicals</item>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
                <keywords scheme="ninesGenre">
                    <list>
                        <item>Prose</item>
                        <item>Ficiton</item>
                        <item>Periodical</item>
                        <note>Possible genres: Architecture, Ephemera, Music, Poetry, Artifacts,
                            Fiction, Nonfiction, Religion, Bibliography, History, Paratext, Review,
                            Collection, Leisure, Periodical, Visual Art, Criticism, Letters,
                            Philosophy, Translation, Drama, Life Writing, Photograph, Travel,
                            Education, Manuscript, Citation, Book History, Politics, Reference
                            Works, Family Life, Law, Folklore, Humor. Please include as many as
                            apply. Place each in its own item tag </note>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
                <keywords scheme="ninesType">
                    <list>
                        <item>Periodical</item>
                        <note>Possible Types (singular): "Periodical" (texts/most stuff), "Interactive Resource" (current writing, 
                            biographies, not old reviews), "Still Image" (images, visual art), "Physical Object" (posters,
                            prospecti)</note>
                        <!-- only choose one item-->
                    </list>
                </keywords>
                
                <keywords scheme="ninesDiscipline">
                    <list>
                        <item>Book History</item>
                        <item>Literature</item>
                        <note>Possible Disciplines (multiple): "Book History (include for all periodical items)," "Literature," "Art History (use for art, also use for reviews)," "History (don't use in a general sense)," "Theatre Studies,"
                            "Musicology," "Philosophy," "Anthropology," "Science"</note>
                        <!--Add items as necessary. Remove items not used.-->
                    </list>
                </keywords>
            </textClass>
        </profileDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text>
        <body>
            <div n="YBV13_45pr" type="prose">
                <pb n="346"/>
            
                <head><title level="a">Two Prose Fancies</title></head> 

                <byline>By <docAuthor><ref target="#RGA">Richard Le Gallienne</ref></docAuthor></byline> 

                <p><emph rend="indent"><emph rend="indent"><emph rend="indent">I&#x2014;Sleeping Beauty</emph></emph></emph></p> 
                <lb/>
                <p>"EVERY woman is a sleeping beauty," I said, sententiously. <lb/>
                    "Only some need more waking than others ?" replied my <lb/>
cynical friend.</p> 

                <p>"Yes, some will only awaken at the kiss of great love or great <lb/>
genius, which are not far from the same thing," I replied.</p> 

<p>"I see," said the gay editor with whom I was talking.</p> 

                <p>Our conversation was of certain authors of our acquaintance, and <lb/>
                    how they managed their inspiration, of what manner were their <lb/>
                    muses, and what the methods of their stimulus. Some, we had <lb/>
                    noted, throve on constancy, to others inconstancy was the <lb/>
                    lawless law of their being; and so accepted had become these <lb/>
                    indispensable conditions of their literary activity that the wives <lb/>
                    had long since ceased to be jealous of the other wives. To a <lb/>
                    household dependent on poetry, constancy in many cases would <lb/>
                    mean poverty, and certain good literary wives had been known to <lb/>
                    rate their husbands with a lazy and unproductive faithfulness. The <lb/>
                    editor sketched a tragic <emph rend="italic">mènage</emph> known to him, where the husband, <lb/>
                    a lyric poet of fame, had become so chronically devoted to his <lb/>
despairing wife that destitution stared them in the face. It was </p>

<fw type="catchword">in</fw> 

<pb n="347"/>

<fw type="runningHead">By Richard Le Gallienne 309</fw> 

                <p>in vain that she implored him, with tears in her eyes, to fall in love <lb/>
                    with some other woman. She, she alone, he said, must be his <lb/>
                    inspiration ; but as the domesticated muse is too often a muse of <lb/>
                    exquisite silence, too happy to sing its happiness, this lawful <lb/>
                    passion, which might otherwise have been turned to account, was <lb/>
unproductive too.</p> 

                <p>"And such a pretty woman," said the editor sympathetically. <lb/>
                    Of another happier case of domestic hallucination, he made the <lb/>
                    remark : "Says he owes it all to his wife ! and you never saw <lb/>
such a plain woman in your life."</p> 

                <p>"How do you know she is plain ?" I asked; "mayn't it be that <lb/>
                    the husband's sense of beauty is finer than yours ? Do you think <lb/>
                    all beauty is for all men ? or that the beauty all can see is best <lb/>
worth seeing ?"</p> 

                <p>And then we spoke the words of wisdom and wit which I have <lb/>
                    written in ebony on the lintel of this little house of words. He <lb/>
                    who would write to live must talk to write, and I confess that I <lb/>
                    took up this point with my friend, and continued to stick to it, <lb/>
                    no doubt to his surprise, because I had at the moment some star- <lb/>
                    dust on the subject nebulously streaming and circling through my <lb/>
                    mind, which I was anxious to shape into something of an ordered <lb/>
                    world. So I talked not to hear myself speak, but to hear myself <lb/>
                    think, always, I will anticipate the malicious reader in saying, an <lb/>
operation of my mind of delightful unexpectedness. </p>

                <p>"Why ! you're actually thinking," chuckles one's brain to itself, <lb/>
                    "go on. Dance while the music's playing," and so the tongue <lb/>
                    goes dancing with pretty partners of words, till suddenly one's <lb/>
                    brain gives a sigh, the wheels begin to slow down, and music and <lb/>
                    dancing stop together, till some chance influence, a sound, a face, <lb/>
                    a flower, how or whence we know not, comes to wind it up <lb/>
again. </p>

<fw type="catchword">The</fw> 

<pb n="348"/>

<fw type="runningHead"><fw type="pageNum">310</fw> Two Prose Fancies</fw> 

                <p>The more one ponders the mystery of beauty, the more one <lb/>
                    realises that the profbundest word in the philosophy of aesthetics is <lb/>
                    that of the simple-subtle old proverb : Beauty is in the eyes of the <lb/>
                    beholder. Beauty, in fact, is a collaboration between the beholder <lb/>
                    and the beheld. It has no abstract existence, and is visible or <lb/>
                    invisible as one has eyes to see or not to see it, that is, as one <lb/>
                    is endowed or not endowed with the sense of beauty, an <lb/>
                    hieratic sense which, strangely enough, is assumed as common to <lb/>
                    humanity. Particularly is this assumption made in regard to the <lb/>
                    beauty of women. Every man, however beauty-blind he may <lb/>
                    really be, considers himself a judge of women&#x2014;though he might <lb/>
                    hesitate to call himself a judge of horses. Far indeed from its <lb/>
                    being true that the sense of beauty is universal, there can be little <lb/>
                    doubt that the democracy is for the most part beauty-blind, and <lb/>
                    that while it has a certain indifferent pleasure in the comeliness <lb/>
                    that comes of health, and the prettiness that goes with ribbons, it <lb/>
                    dislikes and fears that finer beauty which is seldom comely, never <lb/>
pretty, and always strange.</p> 

                <p>National galleries of art are nothing against this truth. Once <lb/>
                    in a while the nation may rejoice over the purchase of a bad <lb/>
                    picture it can understand, but for the most part&#x2014;what to it are all <lb/>
                    these strange pictures, with their disquieting colours and haunted <lb/>
                    faces ? What recks the nation at large of its Bellinis or its <lb/>
                    Botticellis ? what even of its Tithns or its Tintorettos ? Was it <lb/>
                    not the few who bought them, with the money of the many, for <lb/>
the delight of the few ?</p> 

                <p>Well, as no one would dream of art-criticism by <emph rend="italic">plébiscite</emph>, why <lb/>
                    should universal conventions of the beauty of women find so large <lb/>
                    an acceptance merely because they are universal ? There are <lb/>
                    vast multitudes, no doubt, who deem the scented-soap beauties of <lb/>
Bouguereau more beautiful than the strange ladies of Botticelli,</p> 

<fw type="catchword">and,</fw> 

<pb n="349"/>

<fw type="runningHead">By Richard Le Gallienne <fw type="pageNum">311</fw></fw> 

                <p>and, were you to inquire, you would discover that your housemaid <lb/>
                    wonders to herself, as she dusts your pictures to the sound of music- <lb/>
                    hall song, what you can see in the plain lean women of Burne- <lb/>
                    Jones, or the repulsive ugliness of "The Blessed Damosel." She <lb/>
                    thanks heaven that she was not born with such a face, as she <lb/>
                    takes a reassuring glance in the mirror at her own regular prettiness, <lb/>
                    and more marketable bloom. For, you see, this beauty is still <lb/>
                    asleep for her&#x2014;as but a few years ago it was asleep for all but the <lb/>
artists who first kissed it awake. </p>

                <p>All beauty was once asleep like that, even the very beauty your <lb/>
                    housemaid understands and perhaps exemplifies. It lay asleep <lb/>
                    awaiting the eye of the beholder, it lay asleep awaiting the kiss of <lb/>
                    genius ; and, just as one day nothing at all seemed beautiful, so <lb/>
                    some day all things will come to seem so, if the revelation be not <lb/>
already complete.</p> 

                <p>For indeed much beauty that was asleep fifty years ago has <lb/>
                    been passionately awakened and given a sceptre and a kingdom <lb/>
                    since then : the beauty of lonely neglected faces that no man <lb/>
                    loved, or loved only by stealth, for fear of the mockery of the <lb/>
                    blind, the beauty of unconventional contours and unpopular <lb/>
                    colouring, the beauty of pallor, of the red-haired, and the <emph rend="italic">fausse</emph> <lb/>
                    <emph rend="italic">maigre</emph>. The fair and the fat are no longer paramount, and the <lb/>
beauty of forty has her day.</p> 

                <p>Nor have the discoveries of beauty been confined to the faces <lb/>
                    and forms of women. In Nature too the waste places where no <lb/>
                    man sketched or golfed have been reclaimed for the kingdom of <lb/>
                    beauty. The little hills had not really rejoiced us till Wordsworth <lb/>
                    came, but we had learnt his lesson so well that the beauty of the <lb/>
                    plain slept for us all the longer, till with Tennyson and Millet, it <lb/>
                    awakened at last&#x2014;the beauty of desolate levels, solitary moorlands, <lb/>
and the rich melancholy of the fens.</p> 

<fw type="catchword">Wherever</fw> 

<pb n="350"/>

<fw type="runningHead"><fw type="pageNum">312</fw> Two Prose Fancies</fw> 

                <p>Wherever we turn our eyes, we find the beauty of character <lb/>
                    supplanting the beauty of form, or if not supplanting, asserting <lb/>
                    its claim to a place beside the haughty sister who would fain <lb/>
                    keep Cinderella, red-headed and <emph rend="italic">retroussée</emph>, in the background&#x2014;<lb/>
                    yes ! and for many even supplanting ! It is only when regularity <lb/>
                    of form and personal idiosyncrasy and intensity of character are <lb/>
                    united in a face, that the so-called classical beauty is secure of <lb/>
                    holding its own with those whose fealty most matters&#x2014;and that <lb/>
                    union to any triumphant degree is exceedingly rare. Even when <lb/>
                    that union has come about there are those, in this war of the <lb/>
                    classicism and romanticism of faces, who would still choose the <lb/>
                    face dependent on pure effect for its charm ; no mask of <lb/>
                    unchanging beauty, but a beauty whose very life is change, and <lb/>
                    whose magic, so to say, is a miraculous accident, elusive and <lb/>
unaccountable.</p> 

                <p>Miraculous and unaccountable ! In a sense all beauty is that, <lb/>
                    but in the case of the regular, so to say, authorised beauty, <lb/>
                    it seems considerably less so. For in such faces, the old <lb/>
                    beauty-masters will tell you, the brow is of such a breadth and <lb/>
                    shape, the nose so long, the mouth shaped in this way, and the <lb/>
                    eyes set and coloured in that ; and thus, of this happy marriage of <lb/>
                    proportions, beauty has been born. This they will say in spite of <lb/>
                    the everyday fact of thousands of faces being thus proportioned <lb/>
                    and coloured without the miracle taking place, ivory lamps in <lb/>
                    which no light of beauty burns. And it is this fact that proves <lb/>
                    the truth of the newer beauty we are considering. Form is thus <lb/>
                    seen to be dependent on expression, though expression, the new <lb/>
                    beauty-masters would contend, is independent of form. For the <lb/>
                    new beauty there are no such rules ; it is, so to say, a prose beauty, <lb/>
                    for which there is no formulated prosody, entirely free and <lb/>
individual in its rhythms, and personal in its effects. Sculpture is</p> 

<fw type="catchword">no</fw> 

<pb n="351"/>

<fw type="runningHead">By Richard Le Gallienne <fw type="pageNum">313</fw> </fw>

                <p>no longer its chosen voice among the arts, but rather music with <lb/>
its myriad meanings, and its infinitely responsive inflections.</p> 

                <p>You will hear it said of such beauty&#x2014;that it is striking, <lb/>
                    individual, charming, fascinating and so on, but not exactly <lb/>
                    beautiful. This, if you are an initiate of the new beauty, you will <lb/>
                    resist, and permit no other description but beauty&#x2014;the only word <lb/>
                    which accurately expresses the effect made upon you. That such <lb/>
                    effect is not produced upon others need not depress you ; for <lb/>
                    similarly you might say of the beauty that others applaud that for <lb/>
                    you it seems attractive, handsome, pretty, dainty and so on, but <lb/>
                    not exactly beautiful ; or admitting its beauty, that it is but one of <lb/>
                    many types of beauty, the majority of which are neither straight- <lb/>
lined nor regular.</p> 

                <p>For when it is said that certain faces are not exactly beautiful, <lb/>
                    what is meant is that they fail to conform to one or other of the <lb/>
                    straight-lined types ; but by what authority has it been settled <lb/>
                    once and for all that beauty cannot exist outside the straight line <lb/>
                    and the chubby curve ? It matters not what authority one were <lb/>
                    to bring, for vision is the only authority in this matter, and the <lb/>
                    more ancient the authority the less is it final, for it has thus been <lb/>
                    unable to take account of all the types that have come into <lb/>
                    existence since its day, types spiritual, intellectual and artistic, <lb/>
born of the complex experience of the modern world.</p> 

                <p>And yet it has not been the modern world alone that has <lb/>
                    awakened that beauty independent of, and perhaps greater <lb/>
                    than, the beauty of form and colour ; rather it may be said <lb/>
                    to have reawakened it by study of certain subtle old masters of <lb/>
                    the Renaissance; and the great beauties who have made the <lb/>
                    tragedies and love-stories of the world, so far as their faces have <lb/>
                    been preserved to us, were seldom "beautiful," as the populace <lb/>
would understand beauty. For perhaps the highest beauty is</p> 

<fw type="catchword">visible</fw> 

<pb n="352"/>

<fw type="runningHead"><fw type="pageNum">314</fw> Two Prose Fancies</fw> 

                <p>visible only to genius, or that great love which, we have said, is<lb/>
                    a form of genius. It was only, it will be remembered, at the kiss <lb/>
of a prince that Sleeping Beauty might open her wonderful eyes.</p> 
                <lb/>
                <lb/>
                <lb/>
                <p><emph rend="indent"><emph rend="indent"><emph rend="indent">II&#x2014;A Literary Omnibus</emph></emph></emph></p> 
                <lb/>
                <p>THERE were ten of us travelling life's journey together from <lb/>
                    Oxford Circus to the Bank, one to fall away early at <lb/>
                    Tottenham Court Road, leaving his place unfilled till we steamed <lb/>
                    into Holborn at Mudie's, where, looking up to make room for a <lb/>
                    new arrival, I perceived, with an unaccustomed sense of being at <lb/>
                    home in the world, that no less than four of us were reading. It <lb/>
                    became immediately evident that in the new arrival our reading <lb/>
                    party had made an acquisition, for he carried three books in a <lb/>
                    strap, and to the fourth, a dainty blue cloth volume with rough <lb/>
                    edges, he presently applied a paper-knife with that eager tender- <lb/>
                    ness which there is no mistaking. The man was no mere lending <lb/>
                    library reader. He was an aristocrat, a poet among readers, a <lb/>
                    bookman <emph rend="italic">pur sang</emph>. We were all more or less of the upper crust <lb/>
                    ourselves, with the exception of a dry and dingy old gentleman in <lb/>
                    the remote corner who, so far as I could determine, was deep in a <lb/>
                    digest of statutes. His interest in the new-comer was merely an <lb/>
                    automatic raising of the head as the bus stopped, and an automatic <lb/>
                    sinking of it back again as we once more rumbled on. The rest <lb/>
                    of us, however, were not so poorly satisfied. This fifth reader to <lb/>
                    our coach had suddenly made us conscious of our freemasonry, and <lb/>
                    henceforward there was no peace for us till we had, by the politest <lb/>
                    stratagems of observation, made out the titles of the books from <lb/>
                    which as from beakers our eyes were silently and strenuously <lb/>
drinking such different thoughts and dreams.</p> 

<fw type="catchword">The </fw>

<pb n="353"/>

<fw type="runningHead">By Richard Le Gallienne <fw type="pageNum">315</fw></fw> 

                <p>The lady third from the door on the side facing me was reading <lb/>
                    a book which gave me no little trouble to identify, for she kept it <lb/>
                    pressed on her lap with tantalising persistence, and the headlines, <lb/>
                    which I was able to spell out with eyes grown telescopic from <lb/>
                    curiosity, proved those tiresome headlines which refer to the contents <lb/>
                    of chapter or page instead of considerately repeating the title of the <lb/>
                    book. It was not a novel. I could tell that, for there wasn't a <lb/>
                    scrap of conversation, and it wasn't novelist's type. I watched like <lb/>
                    a lynx to catch a look at the binding. Suddenly she liftedit up, <lb/>
                    I cannot help thinking out of sheer kindness, and it proved to be <lb/>
                    a stately unfamiliar edition of a book I should have known well <lb/>
                    enough, simply <emph rend="italic">The French Revolution</emph>. Why will people tease <lb/>
                    one by reading Carlyle in any other edition but the thin little <lb/>
octavos, with the sticky brown and black bindings of old ? </p>

                <p>The pretty dark-haired girl next but one on my own side, <lb/>
what was she reading ? No ! . . . But she was, really !</p> 

                <p>Need I say that my eyes beat a hasty retreat to my little <lb/>
                    neighbour, the new-comer, who sat facing me next to the door, <lb/>
                    one of whose books in the strap I had instantly recognised as <lb/>
                    <emph rend="italic">Weir of Hermiston</emph>. Of the other two, one was provokingly <lb/>
                    turned with the edges only showing, and of the edges I couldn't <lb/>
                    be quite sure, though I was almost certain they belonged to an <lb/>
                    interesting new volume of poems I knew of. The third had the <lb/>
                    look of a German dictionary. But, of course, it was the book he <lb/>
                    was reading that was the chief attraction, and I rather like to <lb/>
                    think that probably I was the only one of his fellow travellers <lb/>
                    who succeeded in detecting the honey-pot from which he was <lb/>
                    delicately feeding. It took me some little time, though the <lb/>
                    book, with its ribbed blue cover gravely lined with gold and its <lb/>
                    crisp rose-yellow paper, struck me with instant familiarity. <lb/>
"Preface to Second Edition," deciphered backwards, was all I</p> 

<fw type="catchword">was</fw> 

<pb n="354"/>

<fw type="runningHead"><fw type="pageNum">316</fw> Two Prose Fancies</fw> 

                <p>was able to make out at first, for the paper-knife loitered dreamily <lb/>
                    among the opening pages, till at last with the turning of a page, <lb/>
                    the prose suddenly gave place to a page prettily broken up with <lb/>
                    lines and half-lines of italics, followed by a verse or two&#x2014;and <lb/>
                    "Of course," I exclaimed to myself, with a curious involuntary <lb/>
gratitude, "it is Dr. Wharton's <emph rend="italic">Sappho</emph>." </p>

                <p>And so it was. That penny bus was thus carelessly carrying <lb/>
                    along the most priceless of written words. We were journeying <lb/>
in the same conveyance with </p>
                <lb/>
<lg type="stanza">
<l rend="indent"><emph rend="italic">"Like the sweet apple which reddens upon the topmost bough,</emph></l> 
<l rend="indent"><emph rend="italic">A-top on the topmost twig&#x2014;which the pluckers forgot somehow&#x2014;</emph></l>
<l rend="indent"><emph rend="italic">Forgot it net, nay, but got it not, for none could get it till now."</emph></l></lg> 

<p>with </p>

<p><emph rend="indent"><emph rend="indent"><emph rend="indent"><emph rend="italic">"I loved thee, Atthis, long ago."</emph> </emph></emph></emph></p>

<p>with</p> 

                <p><emph rend="italic">"The moon has set, and the Pleiades ; it is midnight, the time is going</emph> <lb/>
                    <emph rend="italic">by, and I sleep alone."</emph></p> 
                <lb/>
                <p>Yes, it was no less a presence than Sappho's that had stepped in <lb/>
                    amongst us at the corner of New Oxford Street. Visibly it had <lb/>
                    been a little black-bearded bookman, rather French in appearance, <lb/>
                    possibly a hard-worked teacher of languages&#x2014;but actually it had <lb/>
                    been Sappho. So strange are the contrasts of the modern world, <lb/>
                    so strange the fate of beautiful words. Two thousand five <lb/>
                    hundred years ! So far away from us was the voice that had <lb/>
                    suddenly called to us, a lovely apparition of sound, as we trundled <lb/>
dustily from Oxford Circus to the Bank. </p>

                <p>"The moon has set, and the Pleiades ; it is midnight, the time <lb/>
                    is going by, and I sleep alone," I murmured, as the conductor <lb/>
dropped me at Chancery Lane.</p> 


                
                </div>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI>
