<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-model href="../../../Schema,%20CSS%20and%20Template%20Files/YB_schema2.rnc" type="application/relax-ng-compact-syntax"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
    <teiHeader>
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title>Yellow Nineties 2.0</title>
                <title>The Yellow Book: An Illustrated Quarterly, Volume 10 July 1896</title>
                <title type="YBV10_watt_serjeant"/>

                <editor>Lorraine Janzen Kooistra</editor>
            </titleStmt>
            <editionStmt>
                <p>
                    <date>2020</date>
                </p>
            </editionStmt>
            <publicationStmt>
                <idno>YBV10_26pr</idno>
                <publisher>The Yellow Nineties Online</publisher>
                <pubPlace>Ryerson University</pubPlace>
                <address>
               <addrLine>English Department</addrLine>
               <addrLine>350 Victoria Street,</addrLine>
               <addrLine>Toronto ON,</addrLine>
               <addrLine>M5B 2K3</addrLine>
               <addrLine>Canada</addrLine>
            </address>
                <availability>
                    <p>Usable according to the Creative Commons License <ref
                            target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/">Attribution
                            Non-commercial Share-alike</ref>.</p>
                </availability>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <biblStruct>
                    <monogr>
                        <editor>
                            <persName>Henry Harland</persName>
                        </editor>
                        <author>Francis Watt</author>
                        <title>The Serjeant-at-Law</title>
                        <imprint>
                            <publisher>John Lane</publisher>
                            <pubPlace>London</pubPlace>
                            <publisher>Copeland</publisher>
                            <pubPlace>Boston</pubPlace>
                            <date>July 1896</date>
                            <biblScope>Watt, Francis. "The Serjeant-at-Law." <emph rend="italic">The
                                    Yellow Book</emph>, vol. 10, July 1896, pp. 245-255 <emph rend="italic"
                                    >Yellow Book Digital Edition</emph>, edited by Dennis Denisoff and
                                Lorraine Janzen Kooistra, 2010-2014. <emph rend="italic">Yellow Nineties 2.0</emph>,
                                Ryerson University Centre for Digital Humanities, 2020.
                                https://1890s.ca/YBV10_watt_serjeant/</biblScope>
                        </imprint>
                    </monogr>
                </biblStruct>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
        <encodingDesc>
            <editorialDecl>
                <p>Our editorial method is informed by social-text editing principles. By “text” we mean
                    verbal and visual printed material, including non-referential physical elements such as
                    bindings, page layouts, and ornaments. We view any text as the outcome of collaborative
                    processes that have specific manifestations at precise historical moments.
                    The Yellow Nineties Online publishes facsimile editions of a select collection of fin-de-
                    siècle aesthetic periodicals, together with paratexts of production and reception such as
                    cover designs, advertising materials, and reviews. This historical material is enhanced
                    by two kinds of peer-reviewed scholarly commentary: biographies of the periodicals’
                    contributors and associates; and critical introductions to each title and volume by
                    experts in the field. All scholarly material on the site is vetted by the editor(s) and peer-
                    reviewed by them and/or an international board of advisors. The site as a whole is peer-
                    reviewed by NINES (Networked Infrastructure for Nineteenth-Century Electronic
                    Scholarship). Contributors to the site retain personal copyright in their material. The
                    site is licensed with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0
                    license. Both primary and secondary materials, including all visual images, are marked
                    up in TEI- (Textual-Encoding Initiative) compliant XML (Extensible Markup
                    Language). To ensure maximum flexibility for users, magazines are available on the site
                    as virtual objects (facsimiles) in FlipBook form; in HTML for online reading; in PDF for
                    downloading and collecting; and in XML for those who wish to review and/or adapt our
                    tag sets. In order to make ornamental devices, such as initial letters, head- and tail-
                    pieces, searchable, we have developed a Database of Ornament in OMEKA, and linked it
                    to the relevant pages of each magazine edition. As a dynamic structure, a scholarly
                    website is always in process; Phase One of The Yellow Nineties Online (2010-2015) is
                    completed and Phase Two (2016-2021) is underway.</p>
            </editorialDecl>
        </encodingDesc>
        <profileDesc>
            <creation>
                <date>1896</date>
            </creation>
            <langUsage>
                <language ident="en">English</language>
                <language ident="la">Latin</language>
            </langUsage>
            <textClass>
                <keywords scheme="#lcsh">
                    <list>
                        <item>English literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals</item>
                        <item>Great Britain -- Periodicals</item>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
                <keywords scheme="ninesGenre">
                    <list>
                        <item>Prose</item>
                        <item>Periodical</item>
                        <item>Fiction</item>
                        <item>Poetry</item>
                        <note>Possible genres: Architecture, Ephemera, Music, Poetry, Artifacts,
                            Fiction, Nonfiction, Religion, Bibliography, History, Paratext, Review,
                            Collection, Leisure, Periodical, Visual Art, Criticism, Letters,
                            Philosophy, Translation, Drama, Life Writing, Photograph, Travel,
                            Education, Manuscript, Citation, Book History, Politics, Reference
                            Works, Family Life, Law, Folklore, Humor. Please include as many as
                            apply. Place each in its own item tag </note>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
                <keywords scheme="ninesType">
                    <list>
                        <item>Periodical</item>
                        <note>Possible Types (singular): "Periodical" (texts/most stuff), "Interactive Resource" (current writing, 
                            biographies, not old reviews), "Still Image" (images, visual art), "Physical Object" (posters,
                            prospecti)</note>
                        <!-- only choose one item-->
                    </list>
                </keywords>
                
                <keywords scheme="ninesDiscipline">
                    <list>
                        <item>Book History</item>
                        <item>Literature</item>
                        <note>Possible Disciplines (multiple): "Book History (include for all periodical items)," "Literature," "Art History (use for art, also use for reviews)," "History (don't use in a general sense)," "Theatre Studies,"
                            "Musicology," "Philosophy," "Anthropology," "Science"</note>
                        <!--Add items as necessary. Remove items not used.-->
                    </list>
                </keywords>
            </textClass>
        </profileDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text>
        <body>
            <div n="YBV10_26pr" type="prose">
                <pb n="271"/>
                <head><title>The Serjeant-at-Law</title></head>

                <byline>By <docAuthor><ref target="#FWA">Francis Watt</ref></docAuthor>
                </byline>
                <p>YOU have no doubt, at some time or other, walked through <lb/> the Royal Courts
                    of Justice and admired the judges in their <lb/> scarlet or other bravery. One
                    odd little detail may have caught <lb/> your eye : the wigs of three seniors are
                    differenced from those <lb/> of their brethren by a black patch on the top. It
                    signifies that <lb/> the wearers are serjeants-at-law, and when the last of them
                    goes <lb/> to return no more, with him, it seems, will vanish the Order of <lb/>
                    the Coif. Verily, it will be the "end o' an auld sang," of a <lb/> record
                    stretching back to the beginning of English jurisprudence, <lb/> of an order
                    whose passing had at one time seemed the passing ot <lb/> the law itself. Here,
                    in bare outline, I set forth its ancient and <lb/> famous history. And, first,
                    as to the name. Under the feudal <lb/> system land was held from the Crown upon
                    various tenures. <lb/> Sometimes special services were required from the holders
                    ; these <lb/> were called Serjeants, and the tenure was said to be by serjeanty.
                    <lb/> Special services, though usually military, now and again had to <lb/> do
                    with the administration of justice. A man enjoyed his plot <lb/> because he was
                    coroner, keeper of the peace, summoner, or what <lb/> not ; and, over and above
                    the land, he had the fees of the office. <lb/> A few offices, chiefly legal,
                    came to have no land attached&#x2014;were <lb/> only paid in fees. Such a
                    business was a serjeanty in gross, or at </p>
                <fw type="footer">The Yellow Book&#x2014;Vol. X. p</fw>
                <fw type="catchword">large,</fw>

                <pb n="272"/>

                <fw type="runningHead"><fw type="pageNum">246</fw> The Serjeant-at-Law</fw>

                <p>large, as one might say. Again, after the Conquest, whilst the <lb/> records of
                    our law courts were Latin, the spoken language was <lb/> Norman-French&#x2014;a
                    fearful and wondrous tongue that grew to <lb/> be ; "as ill an hearing in the
                    mouth as law-French," says Milton <lb/> scornfully, and indeed Babel had scarce
                    matched it. But from <lb/> the first it must have been a sore vexation to the
                    thick-witted <lb/> Saxon haled before the tribunal of his conqueror. He needs
                    <lb/> must employ a <emph rend="italic">counter</emph>, or man skilled in the
                        <emph rend="italic">conte</emph>, as the plead-<lb/> ing was called. The
                    business was a lucrative one, so the <lb/> Crown assumed the right of regulation
                    and appointment. It was <lb/> held for a serjeanty in gross, and its holders
                    were <emph rend="italic">servientes regis</emph>
                    <lb/>
                    <emph rend="italic">ad legem</emph>. The word <emph rend="italic">regis</emph>
                    was soon omitted except as regards <lb/> those specially retained for the royal
                    service. The literal trans-<lb/> lation of the other words is serjeants-at-law,
                    still the designation <lb/> of the surviving fellows of the order. The
                    serjeant-at-law was <lb/> appointed, or in form at least, commanded to take
                    office by writ <lb/> under the Great Seal. He was courteously addressed as
                    "you," <lb/> whilst the sheriff was commonly plain "thou " or "thee." The <lb/>
                    King's or Queen's Serjeants were appointed by letters patent; and <lb/> though
                    this official is extinct as the dodo he is mentioned after the <lb/> Queen's
                    Attorney-General as public prosecutor in the proclamation <lb/> still mumbled at
                    the opening of Courts like the Old Bailey. </p>

                <p>Now, in early Norman times the <emph rend="italic">aula regis</emph>, or Supreme
                    Court, <lb/> was simply the king acting as judge with the assistance of his
                    <lb/> great officers of state. In time there developed therefrom among <lb/>
                    much else the three old common law courts ; whereof the <lb/> Common Pleas
                    settled the disputes of subjects, the King's Bench <lb/> suits concerning the
                    king and the realm, the Exchequer revenue <lb/> matters. Though the two last by
                    means of quaint fictions <lb/> afterwards acquired a share of private
                    litigation, yet such was <lb/> more properly for the Court of Common Pleas. It
                    was peculiarly </p>

                <fw type="catchword">the </fw>

                <pb n="273"/>

                <fw type="runningHead">By Francis Watt <fw type="pageNum">247</fw>
                </fw>

                <p>the Serjeants' court, and for many centuries, up to fifty years ago, <lb/> they
                    had the right to exclusive audience. Until the Judicature <lb/> Acts they were
                    the body of men next to the judges, each being <lb/> addressed from the bench as
                    brother, and from them the judges <lb/> must be chosen ; also until 1850 the
                    assizes must be held before a <lb/> judge or a serjeant of the coif.</p>

                <p>A clause in Magna Charta provided that the Common Pleas <lb/> should not follow
                    the king's wanderings but sit in a fixed place ; <lb/> this "fixed place" came
                    to be near the great door of the Hall at <lb/> Westminster. When the wind was in
                    the north, the spot was <lb/> cold and draughty, so after the Restoration some
                    daring innovator <lb/> proposed "to let it (the Court) in through the wall into
                    a back <lb/> room which they called the treasury." Sir Orlando Bridgeman, <lb/>
                    the chief justice, would on no account hear of this. It was a <lb/> flagrant
                    violation of Magna Charta to move it an inch. Might <lb/> not, he darkly hinted,
                    all its writs be thus rendered null and void ? <lb/> Was legal pedantry ever
                    carried further ? one wonders. In a <lb/> later age the change was made without
                    comment, and in our own <lb/> time the Common Pleas itself has gone to the
                    lumber-room. No <lb/> doubt this early fixing of the Court helped to develop a
                    bar <lb/> attendant on it. Other species of practitioners, barristers,
                    attorneys, <lb/> solicitors in time arose, and the appointment of Queen's
                    Counsel, <lb/> of whom Lord Bacon was the earliest, struck the first real blow
                    <lb/> at the Order of the Coif, but the detail of such things is not for <lb/>
                    this page. In later days every serjeant was a more fully developed <lb/>
                    barrister, and then and now, as is well known, every barrister <lb/> must belong
                    to one of the four Inns of Court&#x2014;the two temples, <lb/> Gray's Inn and
                    Lincoln's Inn to wit, whose history cannot be <lb/> told here ; suffice it to
                    say they were voluntary associations of <lb/> lawyers, which gradually acquired
                    the right of calling to the bar <lb/> those who wished to practise. </p>

                <fw type="catchword">Now</fw>

                <pb n="274"/>

                <fw type="runningHead"><fw type="pageNum">248</fw> The Serjeant-at-Law </fw>

                <p>Now the method of appointment of Serjeants was as follows : <lb/> The judges,
                    headed by the chief justice of the Common Pleas, <lb/> picked out certain
                    eminent barristers as worthy of the dignity, <lb/> their names were given in to
                    the Lord Chancellor, and in due <lb/> time each had his writ whereof he formally
                    gave his Inn notice. <lb/> His House entertained him at a public breakfast,
                    presented him <lb/> with a gold or silver net purse with ten guineas or so as a
                    retain-<lb/> ing fee, the chapel bell was tolled, and he was solemnly rung out
                    <lb/> of the bounds. On the day of his call he was harangued (often at <lb/>
                    preposterous length) by the chief justice of the King's Bench, he <lb/> knelt
                    down, and the white coif of the order was fitted on his head ; <lb/> he went in
                    procession to Westminster and "counted" in a real <lb/> action in the Court of
                    Common Pleas. For centuries he did so <lb/> in law-French. Lord Hardwicke was
                    the first serjeant who <lb/> "counted" in English. The new-comer was admitted a
                    member <lb/> of Serjeants Inn, in Chancery Lane, in ancient times called <lb/>
                    Farringdon Inn, whereof all the members were Serjeants. Here <lb/> they dined
                    together on the first and last days of term : their <lb/> clerks also dined in
                    hall, though at a separate table&#x2014;a survival, no <lb/> doubt, from the
                    days when the retainer feasted, albeit "below the <lb/> salt," with his master.
                    Dinner done and the napery removed, <lb/> the board of green cloth was
                    constituted, and under the presidency <lb/> of the chief judge the business of
                    the House was transacted. <lb/> There was a second Serjeants' Inn in Fleet
                    Street, but in 1758 its <lb/> members joined the older institution in Chancery
                    Lane. When <lb/> the Judicature Acts practically abolished the order, the Inn
                    was <lb/> sold and its property divided among the members, a scandalous <lb/>
                    proceeding and poor result of "the wisdom of an heep of lernede <lb/> men !" </p>

                <p>The Serjeant's feast on his appointment was a magnificent affair, <lb/>
                    <emph rend="italic">instar corcnationis</emph>,as Fortescue has it. In old times
                    it lasted seven </p>
                <fw type="catchword">days; </fw>

                <pb n="275"/>

                <fw type="runningHead">By Francis Watt <fw type="pageNum">249</fw>
                </fw>

                <p>days , one of the largest palaces in the metropolis was selected, <lb/> and kings
                    and queens graced its quaint ceremonial. Stow <lb/> chronicles one such
                    celebration at the call of eleven Serjeants in <lb/> 1531. There were consumed
                    "twenty- four great beefes, one <lb/> hundred fat muttons, fifty-one great
                    veales, thirty-four porkes," <lb/> not to mention the swans, the larkes, the
                    "capons of Kent," the <lb/> "carcase of an ox from the shambles," and so forth.
                    One fancies <lb/> these solids were washed down by potations proportionately
                    long <lb/> and deep. And there were other attractions and other expenses. <lb/>
                    At the feast in October 1552, "a standing dish of wax represent-<lb/> ing the
                    Court of Common Pleas" was the admiration of the <lb/> guests ; again, a year or
                    two later, it is noted that each serjeant <lb/> was attended by three gentlemen
                    selected by him from among the <lb/> members of his own Inn to act as his sewer,
                    his carver, and his <lb/> cup-bearer. These Gargantuan banquets must have proved
                    a <lb/> sore burden : they were cut down to one day, and, on the union <lb/> of
                    the Inns in 1758, given up as unsuited to the newer time.</p>

                <p>One expense remained. Serjeants on their call must give gold <lb/> rings to the
                    sovereign, the lord chancellor, the judges, and many <lb/> others. From about
                    the time of Elizabeth mottoes or "posies" <lb/> were engraved thereon. Sometimes
                    each serjeant had his own <lb/> device, more commonly the whole call adopted the
                    same motto, <lb/> which was usually a compliment to the reigning monarch or an
                    <lb/> allusion to some public event. Thus, after the Restoration the <lb/> words
                    ran : <emph rend="italic">Adeste Carolus Magnus</emph>. With a good deal of
                    elision <lb/> and twisting the Roman numerals for 1660 were extracted from <lb/>
                    this, to the huge delight of the learned triflers. <emph rend="italic">Imperlum
                        et</emph>
                    <lb/>
                    <emph rend="italic">libertas</emph> was the word for 1700, and <emph
                        rend="italic">plus quam speravlmus</emph> that of <lb/> 1714, which was as
                    neat as any. The rings were presented to <lb/> the judges by the serjeant's
                    "colt," as the barrister attendant on <lb/> him through the ceremony was called
                    (probably from colt, an </p>

                <fw type="catchword">apprentice) ;</fw>

                <pb n="276"/>

                <fw type="runningHead"><fw type="pageNum">250</fw> The Serjeant-at-Law </fw>

                <p>apprentice) ; he also had a ring. In the ninth of Geo. II. the <lb/> fourteen new
                    Serjeants gave as of duty 1409 rings, valued at <lb/> &#x00A3;773- That call
                    cost each serjeant nearly &#x00A3;200. This ring- <lb/> giving continued to the
                    end ; another custom, that of giving <lb/> liveries to relatives and friends,
                    was discontinued in 1759. </p>
                <lb/>

                <p>In mediaeval times the new Serjeants went in procession to <lb/> St. Paul's, and
                    worshipped at the shrine of Thomas à Becket ; then <lb/> to each was allotted a
                    pillar so that his clients might know where <lb/> to find him. The Reformation
                    put a summary end to the wor- <lb/> ship of St. Thomas, but the formality of the
                    pillar lingered on till <lb/> Old St. Paul's and Old London blazed in the Great
                    Fire of 1666. </p>
                <p>The mediaeval lawyer lives for us to-day in Chaucer's famous<lb/> picture : </p>

                <lg type="stanza">
                    <l>"A Sergeant of Lawe, war and wys,</l>
                    <l>That often hadde ben atte parvys, </l>
                    <l>Ther was also, ful riche of excellence. </l>
                    <l>Discret he was, and of great reverence : </l>
                    <l>He semede such, his wordes weren so wise,</l>
                    <l>Justice he was ful often in assise,</l>
                    <l>By patente, and by pleyn commissioun ;</l>
                    <l>For his science, and for his heih renoun, </l>
                    <l>Of fees and robes hadde he many oon. </l>
                    <l>So gret a purchasour was nowher noon. </l>
                    <l>Al was fee symple to him in effecte,</l>
                    <l>His purchasyng mighte nought ben enfecte.</l>
                    <l>Nowher so besy a man as he ther nas, </l>
                    <l>And yit he seemede besier than he was. </l>
                    <l>In termes hadde he caas and domes alle ;</l>
                    <l>That fro the tyme of kyng William were falle.</l>
                    <l>Therto he couthe endite, and make a thing,</l>
                    <l>Ther couthe no wight pynche at his writyng ; </l>
                    <l>And every statute couthe he pleyn by roote. </l>
                </lg>

                <fw type="catchword">He </fw>

                <pb n="277"/>

                <fw type="runningHead">By Francis Watt <fw type="pageNum">251</fw>
                </fw>

                <lg type="stanza">
                    <l>He rood but hoomly in a medlé coote,</l>
                    <l>Gird with a seynt of silk, with barres smale ;</l>
                    <l>Of his array telle I no lenger tale."</l>
                </lg>

                <p>How lifelike that touch of the fussy man, who "seemede besier <lb/> than he was
                    !" But each line might serve as text for a long dis-<lb/> sertation ! The old
                    court hours were early : the judges sat from <lb/> eight till eleven, when your
                    busy serjeant would, after bolting his <lb/> dinner, hie him to his pillar where
                    he would hear his client's <lb/> story, "and take notes thereof upon his knee."
                    The parvys or <lb/> pervyse of Paul's&#x2014;properly, only the church
                    door&#x2014;had come to <lb/> mean the nave of the cathedral, called also
                    "Paul's Walk," or<lb/> "Duke Humphrey's Walk," from the supposed tomb of Duke
                    <lb/> Humphrey that stood there. In Tudor times it was the great <lb/> lounge
                    and common newsroom of London. Here the needy ad-<lb/> venturer "dined with Duke
                    Humphrey," as the quaint euphemism <lb/> ran ; here spies garnered in the
                    popular opinion for the authorities. <lb/> It was the very place for the lawyer
                    to meet his client, yet had he <lb/> other resorts : the round of the Temple
                    Church and Westminster <lb/> are noted as in use for consultations. </p>

                <p>Chaucer's serjeant "rood but hoomly" because he was travel-<lb/> ling ; in court
                    he had a long priest-like robe, with a furred cape <lb/> about his shoulders and
                    a scarlet hood. The gowns were various, <lb/> and sometimes parti-coloured. Thus
                    in 1555 we find each new <lb/> serjeant possessed of one robe of scarlet, one of
                    violet, one of <lb/> brown and blue, one of mustard and murrey, with tabards
                    (short <lb/> sleeveless coats) of cloths of the same colours. The cape was <lb/>
                    edged, first with lambskin, afterwards with more precious stuff.<lb/> In
                    Langland's <emph rend="italic">Vision of Piers Plowman</emph> (1362) there is
                    mention <lb/> of this dress of the Serjeants, they are jibed at for their love
                    of <lb/> fees and so forth, after a fashion that is not yet extinct ! But <lb/>
                    <emph rend="italic">the</emph> distinctive feature in the dress was the coif, a
                    close-fitting head </p>

                <fw type="catchword">covering </fw>

                <pb n="278"/>

                <fw type="runningHead"><fw type="pageNum">252</fw> The Serjeant-at-Law </fw>

                <p>covering made of white lawn or silk. A badge of honour, it was <lb/> worn on all
                    professional occasions, nor was it doffed even in the <lb/> king's presence. In
                    monumentnl effigies it is ever clearly shown. <lb/> When a serjeant resigned his
                    dignity he was formally discharged <lb/> from the obligation of wearing it. To
                    discuss its exact origin <lb/> were fruitless, yet one ingenious if mistaken
                    conjecture may be <lb/> noticed. Our first lawyers were churchmen, but in 1217
                    these <lb/> were finally debarred from general practice in the courts. Many
                    <lb/> were unwilling to abandon so lucrative a calling, but what about <lb/> the
                    tonsure ? "They were for decency and comeliness allowed <lb/> to cover their
                    bald pates with a coif, which has been ever since <lb/> retained." Thus the
                    learned Serjeant Wynne in his tract on the <lb/> antiquity and dignity of the
                    order (1765). In Tudor times, if <lb/> not before, fashion required the serjeant
                    to wear a small skull-cap <lb/> of black silk or velvet on the top of the coif.
                    This is very clearly <lb/> shown in one of Lord Coke's portraits. Under Charles
                    II. <lb/> lawyers, like other folk, began to wear wigs, the higher they were
                    <lb/> the bigger their perukes. It was wittily said that bench and bar <lb/>
                    went into mourning on Queen Anne's death, and so remained, <lb/> since their
                    present dress is that then adopted. Serjeants were un-<lb/> willing to lose
                    sight of their coifs altogether, and it was suggested <lb/> on the wig by a
                    round patch of black and white, representing the <lb/> white coif and the cap
                    which had covered it. The limp cap of <lb/> black cloth known as the "black cap"
                    which the judge assumes <lb/> when about to pass sentence of death was, it
                    seems, put on to veil <lb/> the coif, and as a sign of sorrow. It was also
                    carried in the hand <lb/> when attending divine service, and was possibly
                    assumed in pre- <lb/> Reformation times when prayers were said for the dead. </p>

                <p>A few words will tell of the fall of the order. As far back as <lb/> 1755 Sir
                    John Willis, chief justice of the Common Pleas, pro-<lb/> posed to throw open
                    that Court as well as the office of judge to </p>

                <fw type="catchword">barristers</fw>

                <pb n="279"/>

                <fw type="runningHead">By Francis Watt <fw type="pageNum">253</fw></fw>

                <p>barristers who were not Serjeants, but the suggestion came to <lb/> nothing. In
                    1834, the bill for the establishment of a Central <lb/> Criminal Court contained
                    a clause to open the Common Pleas ; <lb/> this was dropped, but the same object
                    was attained by a royal <lb/> warrant, 25th April 1834. The legality of this was
                    soon <lb/> questioned and, after solemn argument before the Privy Council, <lb/>
                    it was declared invalid. In 1846 a statute (the 9 &#x0026; 10 Viet. <lb/> c. 54)
                    to the same effect settled the matter, and the Judicature Act <lb/> of 1873
                    provided that no judge need in future be a serjeant. On <lb/> the dissolution of
                    Serjeants' Inn its members were received back <lb/> into the Houses whence they
                    had come. </p>

                <p>As for centuries all the judges were Serjeants, the history of the <lb/> order is
                    that of the bench and bar of England ; yet some famous <lb/> men rose no higher,
                    or for one reason or other became representa-<lb/> tive members. Such a one was
                    Sir John Maynard (1602-1690). <lb/> In his last years William III. commented on
                    his venerable appear-<lb/> ance : "He must have outlived all the lawyers of his
                    time." "If <lb/> your Highness had not come I should have outlived the law
                    itself," <lb/> was the old man's happy compliment. Pleading in a Chancery <lb/>
                    case, he remarked that he had been counsel in the same case half <lb/> a century
                    before ; he had steered a middle course in those troubled <lb/> times, but he
                    had leant to the side of freedom against King <lb/> and Protector alike. His
                    share in the impeachment of Stafford <lb/> procured him a jibe in Butler's <emph
                        rend="italic">Hudibras</emph>, yet it was said that <lb/> all parties seemed
                    willing to employ him, and that he seemed <lb/> willing to be employed by all.
                    Jeffreys, who usually deferred to <lb/> him, once blustered out, "You are so old
                    as to forget your law, <lb/> Brother Maynard." "True, Sir George, I have
                    forgotten more <lb/> law than ever you knew," was the crushing retort. Macaulay
                    <lb/> has justly praised his conduct at the Revolution for that he urged <lb/>
                    his party to disregard legal technicalities and adopt new methods </p>

                <fw type="catchword">for </fw>

                <pb n="280"/>

                <fw type="runningHead"><fw type="pageNum">254</fw> The Serjeant-at-Law</fw>

                <p>for new and unheard-of circumstances. Edmund Plowden (1518-<lb/> 1585) deserves
                    at least equally high praise. He was so determined <lb/> a student that "for
                    three years he went not once out of the <lb/> Temple." He is said to have
                    refused the chancellorship offered <lb/> him by Elizabeth as he would not desert
                    the old faith. He was <lb/> attacked again and again for nonconformity, but his
                    profound <lb/> knowledge of legal technicalities enabled him on each occasion to
                    <lb/> escape the net spread for him. He was an Englishman loyal to <lb/> the
                    core, and, Catholic as he was, opposed in 1555 the violent <lb/> proceedings of
                    Queen Mary's parliament. The attorney-general <lb/> filed a bill against him for
                    contempt, but "Mr. Plowden traversed <lb/> fully, and the matter was never
                    decided." "A traverse full of <lb/> pregnancy," is Lord Coke's enthusiastic
                    comment. On his death <lb/> in 1585 they buried him in that Temple Church whose
                    soil <lb/> must have seemed twice sacred to this oracle of the law. An <lb/>
                    alabaster monument whereon his effigy reposes remains to this <lb/> day. A less
                    distinguished contemporary was William Bendloes <lb/> (1516-1584), Old Bendloes
                    men called him. A quaint legend <lb/> reports him the only serjeant at the
                    Common Pleas bar in the <lb/> first year of Elizabeth's reign. Whether there was
                    no business, <lb/> or merely half-guinea motions of course, or the one man
                    argued <lb/> on both sides, or whether the whole story be a fabrication, 'tis
                    scarce <lb/> worth while to inquire. </p>

                <p>I pass to more modern times. William Davy was made serjeant- <lb/> at-law in
                    1754. His wit combats with Lord Mansfield are still <lb/> remembered. His
                    lordship was credited with a desire to sit on <lb/> Good Friday ; our serjeant
                    hinted that he would be the first <lb/> judge that had done so since Pontius
                    Pilate ! Mansfield scouted <lb/> one of Davy's legal propositions. "If that be
                    law I must <lb/> burn all my books." "Better read them first," was the quiet
                    <lb/> answer. </p>

                <fw type="catchword">In</fw>

                <pb n="281"/>

                <fw type="runningHead">By Francis Watt <fw type="pageNum">255</fw>
                </fw>

                <p>In recent days two of the best known Serjeants were Parry and <lb/> Ballantine,
                    the first a profound lawyer, the second a great advocate, <lb/> but both are
                    vanished from the scene. Three Serjeants yet <lb/> remain : Lord Esher (Master
                    of the Rolls), Lord Justice Lindley, <lb/> and Mr. Baron Pollock.</p>





            </div>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI>
